IBJOpinion

What about worker safety?

March 19, 2011
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Letters To The Editor

Am I correct in reading this that the Republicans are the ones voting against a real smoking ban? This is a very hot button item for me. I am always astounded to listen to any argument against putting this ban in place. Go to any major city around, none allow smoking and no one has lost any revenue.  How does government not get involved in employee health issues? Our company had the federal government all over us for digging a 2 foot hole and not having a ladder present! This is government absurdity at its highest.

____________

Bruce Torrance
CFO, Mainscape Inc.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Figures Lie?
    The government DOES have work safety rules and a body to oversee them. OSHA is responsible for them and it has refused to rule on secondary smoke exposure. Why? Because the risk is so far below anything it normally deals with. At one point ASH tried to force a ruling with a lawsuit. OSHA wrote ASH and told them to drop the lawsuit or they WOULD set a standard and it WOULD allow smoking.

    As far as "no one losing any revenue," well, if that's true, then why not lift the ban? After all, if it hasn't hurt anyone's business why would they go back to allowing it.

    However, you might also want to explain why the State Goverment of Minnesota is lying when its figures show losses literally in the hundreds of millions of dollars JUST in its "charitable gambling" revenues -- largely bar-based pull-tab and Keno type things. What motivation would they have for lying? Google V.Gen5h and read the "Health Arguments" there. Note the graph of Minnesota official state figures on page 18.

    Michael J. McFadden
    Author of "Dissecting Antismokers' Brains"
  • Because...
    Workers are not required to work at a smoking establishment. They do so because they make that work choice.

    As far as not losing business because of a smoking ban, why not let the businesses evaluate that information and choosing whether to have smoking rather than government mandating a smoking ban?

    Freedom...it's a good thing.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
thisissue1-092914.jpg 092914

Subscribe to IBJ
ADVERTISEMENT