IBJNews

Whistleblower suit cites Rolls-Royce engine flaws

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Rolls-Royce Corp. concealed repeated defects at an aircraft engine plant in Indianapolis and fired a safety official for reporting the problems, according to a whistleblower lawsuit filed in federal court.

Lawyers for Thomas McArtor said a federal court in Indianapolis unsealed his complaint Tuesday, 34 months after it was filed. His lawyer criticized the long-running secrecy.

"Aircraft manufacturers enjoy a special position of public trust," said Mike Kanovitz of Loevy & Loevy. "It is arrogant for any of them to pick and choose which defects the public gets to hear about. Aircraft operators and airline travelers deserve complete transparency so that they can evaluate the risks and take steps to protect themselves."

The Associated Press left several e-mail and telephone messages for London-based Rolls-Royce seeking comment Wednesday.

McArtor was a senior quality-control official for Rolls-Royce and the Federal Aviation Administration's chief designated airworthiness representative for the plant, according to the complaint. It said he worked there for 12 years before being fired in 2007.

The suit says the company cut quality controls to increase profits, then concealed information about an increase in defects from customers.

It says problems affect the Model 250, T56 and AE2100 engines, used in civilian and military aircraft. They include Bell helicopters, Saab turbo props, C130 transports, and the Kiowa military helicopter.

The suit says some engines from the plant have experienced 'catastrophic failures," including nine that have failed in Iraq, causing the loss of U.S. lives.

Rolls-Royce was the manufacturer at a different plant of a Trent 900 engine that blew apart Nov. 4 on superjumbo Airbus A380 passenger jet operated by Qantas. The plane had about 450 passengers aboard and made a safe emergency landing.

Rolls-Royce’s Indianapolis manufacturing facility employs about 4,300, making the British aerospace firm the city’s second-largest manufacturer behind Eli Lilly and Co.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • No need for oversite and regulations
    Here is a perfect example why the GOP clammer for doing away with oversite, regulations, inspections, is bad for America. The GOP who thinks nothing ever would happen and these regulations are just burdensome have brought to us the BP oil disaster, ERON, and now RR's jet engines, just to name a few.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. A Tilted Kilt at a water park themed hotel? Who planned that one? I guess the Dad's need something to do while the kids are on the water slides.

  2. Don't come down on the fair for offering drinks. This is a craft and certainly one that belongs in agriculture due to ingredients. And for those worrying about how much you can drink. I'm sure it's more to do with liability than anything else. They don't want people suing for being over served. If you want a buzz, do a little pre-drinking before you go.

  3. I don't drink but go into this "controlled area" so my friend can drink. They have their 3 drink limit and then I give my friend my 3 drink limit. How is the fair going to control this very likely situation????

  4. I feel the conditions of the alcohol sales are a bit heavy handed, but you need to realize this is the first year in quite some time that beer & wine will be sold at the fair. They're starting off slowly to get a gauge on how it will perform this year - I would assume if everything goes fine that they relax some of the limits in the next year or couple of years. That said, I think requiring the consumption of alcohol to only occur in the beer tent is a bit much. That is going to be an awkward situation for those with minors - "Honey, I'm getting a beer... Ok, sure go ahead... Alright see you in just a min- half an hour."

  5. This might be an effort on the part of the State Fair Board to manage the risk until they get a better feel for it. However, the blanket notion that alcohol should not be served at "family oriented" events is perhaps an oversimplification. and not too realistic. For 15 years, I was a volunteer at the Indianapolis Air Show, which was as family oriented an event as it gets. We sold beer donated by Monarch Beverage Company and served by licensed and trained employees of United Package Liquors who were unpaid volunteers. And where did that money go? To central Indiana children's charities, including Riley Hospital for Children! It's all about managing the risk.

ADVERTISEMENT