IBJOpinion

HETRICK: Will Hoosier honchos buy Chicken Little’s hokum?

Bruce Hetrick
November 9, 2013
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Bruce Hetrick

A note to Gov. Mike Pence, Speaker Brian Bosma and Sen. David Long.

Dear Mike, Brian and David:

Sorry for the impersonal salutation, but I’m writing on a personal matter. I want to ask how your marriages are faring. Mine is quite joyous, thank you. I sincerely hope you can say the same.

I ask because Chicken Little stopped by the farm here in Pendleton on Oct. 28, with Henny Penny and Ducky Lucky following close behind.

“The sky is falling,” said Chicken Little.

“How do you know?” I said.

“Saw it on Facebook,” said Chicken Little.

“Facebook?” I said.

“I hacked into your account,” said Chicken Little.

“You what?” I said.

“Don’t worry. There’s nothing there but chicken feed,” said Chicken Little. “But while I was logged in, I saw that picture of your friends Deb and Beth in Central Park. The post said, ‘No words can describe the joy of LEGAL after 17 years of raising children and caring for aging parents—together!’

“I’m betting they got hitched,” said Chicken Little.

“Married,” said Henny Penny.

“The big commitment,” said Ducky Lucky.

“We’ll deal with the hacking later,” I said. “But what does Deb’s and Beth’s marriage have to do with the sky falling?”

“They’re lesbians,” said Chicken Little.

“Ick,” said Henny Penny.

“Can’t fertilize eggs that way,” said Ducky Lucky.

“Wait, wait, wait,” I said. “Again, what does this have to do with the sky falling?”

“Well,” said Chicken Little. “If ‘those people’ can get married, it will clip us normal birds’ wings. The sky will fall on traditional chicken-coop values.”

“Yeah,” said Ducky Lucky. “If birds of a feather can flock together, normal marriage won’t be all it’s quacked up to be.”

“Rim shot,” said Henny Penny.

“Listen, my fine-feathered friends,” I said, “I don’t know where you got these harebrained notions, but how does a marriage between any two loving people affect other people’s marriages?

“Deb and Beth are successful businesswomen. They’re women of strong faith. They helped raise a remarkable daughter. They’ve raised tens of thousands of dollars for charity. They’ve created jobs. They’ve traveled the world. And they’ve been together for almost two decades. What’s wrong with that picture?”

“The sky is falling,” said Chicken Little. “Heard it on Fox TV.”

“The sky is falling,” said Henny Penny. “Heard it from Chicken Little.”

“The sky is falling,” said Ducky Lucky. “Heard it from Henny Penny.”

Thus, gentlemen, I return to my question. The Indiana Family Institute and its ilk would have us believe that marriages such as Deb’s and Beth’s will send the sky falling on marriages such as yours and mine.

But go figure: It’s been two weeks since Deb and Beth got married, and I’ve yet to see the heterosexual masses rushing to divorce court or family counselors.

Meanwhile, the Chicken Littles, Henny Pennys and Ducky Luckys of our state still want a gay marriage ban in our state Constitution.

Last week in this publication, I read column after column on this topic. One cited opinion polls. Another talked history. Still others discussed faith, economic development and Hoosier hospitality.

I read them. Then I read the Constitution. It notes the rights Indiana will protect for all the people, not the rights it will deny a few.

The only denial I find: one “convicted of an infamous crime” may not vote.

Surely, two loving persons getting married is not on par with that.

In addition to saying that “all people”—including, presumably, Deb and Beth—are “created equal” and that “they are endowed by their CREATOR” with “inalienable rights” to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,” the Indiana Constitution says: “The General Assembly shall not grant to any citizen, or class of citizens, privileges or immunities, which, upon the same terms, shall not equally belong to all citizens.”

Except, of course, the privilege to marry the person one loves if that person happens to be of the same sex.

Gentlemen, the gay marriage amendment is not a matter for opinion polls or a referendum. It’s a matter of law and individual civil liberties. Our Constitution does not allow the imposition of anyone’s religious views—even if they’re espoused by the majority of the people—upon others. It does provide for equal protection under the law, for Deb, Beth, and all the rest of our state’s citizens.

But mostly, Chicken Little is wrong. The sky is not falling. This amendment is a distraction. You and we have bigger concerns at hand: jobs, education, health and caring for the least among us.

Please, shoot this legislation down before we waste millions of dollars embarrassing ourselves and our state. Your marriages and mine, your families and mine—and Deb’s and Beth’s marriage and family, too—will all be just fine if we send Chicken Little back to the coop.•

__________

Hetrick is an Indianapolis-based writer, speaker and public relations consultant. His column appears twice a month. He can be reached at bhetrick@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Free Market Marriage Solution
    Let's resolve protection of marriage with a market-based solution: Marriage Protection Insurance. The closer you live to a committed same sex couple, the higher the risk (or its perception by the skyfallers) and hence the premium. What could be more American than that?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT