Will Medicaid expansion actually work?

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

It would be “absurd” and a “travesty” for Indiana not to expand its Medicaid program, according to two local hospital officials. And yet other health care leaders do not expect expanded Medicaid coverage to provide nearly as much help to uninsured Hoosiers as hoped.

Those were the sentiments that came out during the IBJ Health Care Power Breakfast on Sept. 28 at the Downtown Marriott hotel.

The 2010 health reform law called for all states to expand their Medicaid health insurance programs so that residents with incomes up to 138 percent of the federal poverty limit are eligible. Such an expansion is estimated to cover more than 500,000 Hoosiers and cost the state of Indiana $516 million per year by 2020.

But several power breakfast panelists pointed out that health insurance is not the same as health care—and that uninsured Hoosiers who become eligible for Medicaid may not end up with any better access to health care providers than they have now.

“It could actually impact access to health care,” said Vicki Perry, CEO of Advantage Health Solutions Inc., an Indianapolis-based health insurer. “Because more people accessing the system with the same number of providers and the same model of care is going to drain resources.” (See below for a video interview with Perry about changes in Medicare and Medicaid.)

Americans with health insurance tend to consume about twice as much health care as those without insurance. But if there isn’t a big increase in the number of doctors—and no one expects there will be—it may be difficult for Medicaid patients (and perhaps all patients) to get timely appointments with doctors. That could cause patients covered by Medicaid to frequent hospital emergency rooms and urgent care centers, as many uninsured patients do now.

“If you widen the doors to an auditorium, you don't increase the seats nor make it more comfortable. And so we can increase access to the insured but I think we still have a real problem with the current health system being incapable to take on a broader insured population,” said Dr. Greg Larkin, commissioner of the Indiana State Department of Health. “Because I don't think necessarily, at least throughout the state, we have the capability that we wish we had. Our primary care physicians and extenders are limited, particularly in rural areas.”

The decision to expand Medicaid will fall to the winner of the gubernatorial contest between Republican Mike Pence and Democrat John Gregg, and the Indiana General Assembly. Pence, who has been leading in polls, has continued to criticize the 2010 Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act, but has never said explicitly whether he would call for a Medicaid expansion. Republican legislative leaders have said they favor not expanding the program.

Hospitals certainly like the law, because it attempts to expand insurance coverage to an additional 32 million Americans. But without an expansion of Medicaid, hospitals would see only about half of those new paying customers.

“It would be a travesty if we didn't expand coverage for the 800,000 fellow Hoosiers that are bare right now,” said Bob Brody, CEO of the Franciscan St. Francis Health hospital system in Indianapolis, citing the number of Hoosiers that go without health insurance during at least part of a year. “And the fact of the matter is, the federal government is providing the bulk of the reimbursement for that expanded coverage, so we should consider moving forward.”

Indeed, if Indiana expanded Medicaid as called for under the law, actuarial firm Milliman Inc. projects the state would draw down an additional $3.4 billion per year in federal funding. Since its launch in 1967, Medicaid has been funded jointly by states and the federal government. In Indiana today, the state pays about 25 percent of the total cost of the program.

“It's absolutely absurd not to expand it,” said Dr. Ram Yeleti, president of Community Physician Network, the physician practice arm of the Indianapolis-based Community Health Network hospital system. “States like Massachusetts that have expanded Medicaid, they've reduced their actual mortality by about 20 percent. Twenty percent mortality reduction for a cancer drug can be a blockbuster for a company.”

But Yeleti agreed with Perry, the insurance executive, that expanding Medicaid by itself will not solve the health problems that often beset low-income Hoosiers. What the state really needs, Perry said, is to focus more on bringing care to poorly served areas.

“As a community, we need to figure out how to deliver a model of care to the uninsured that is not system-dependent, health-system-dependent, but is community-dependent and really figure out how can we bring care into the communities that we serve that will meet the people instead of trying to [get] the people into the health system itself,” she said, adding, “When we figure that one out, we won't have as many or it won't be as important to be uninsured because they'll still have access to care.”



  • Don't Do It!
    Be very careful what you wish for Indianans! As more and more people join the Medicaid roles the amount of money contributed by the feds goes down and the amount contributed by the state goes up. This is due to an arcane funding formula used for "sharing" the costs of Medicaid. All you have to do is look at states such as New York and California, Illinois too and you will see a 50/50 split. Then when the state cannot aford Medicaid any more they will split the state's share 50/50 with the local counties as NY does. And guess what, your local taxes, such as property taxes, are going to go through the roof! You will rue the day Indiana accepts more Medicaid cash from the feds to expand the rolls. You, the public aren't told about this and you'll suffer for it! These "old" medicaid rules were not changed. You are screwing yourselves! Only the executives of the hospitals may like this because they'll demand bigger salaries because they're taking care of more people!!! I deserve it!!!

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............