IBJNews

  • Home

Wind energy jobs sought at Dallas trade show

 IBJ Staff
May 19, 2010
Keywords
Economic Development, Economic Development Agencies, Electric, Energy & Environment, Government & Economic Development, Indiana Economic Development Corp., Indy Partnership, Utilities, Wind Power
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

State economic development officials will blow into Dallas next week to attend the nation's top trade show for wind energy, Windpower 2010.

They'll be trying to lasso additional wind-energy firms to Indiana, which in 2009 ranked second among states in adding wind generation.

More than 1,300 exhibitors and 23,000 national and international "wind-energy leaders" are expected to attend the event.  

Indiana now has a handful of wind farms, mostly in the northern half of the state. Coal-powered utilities, including Indianapolis Power & Light and Duke Energy Corp., buy a tiny sliver of their power from Hoosier farms but are expected to pursue more wind energy as Congress contemplates financial penalties for carbon-dioxide emissions.

“With the work force and logistics infrastructure already in place, we will continue to promote Indiana's assets in wind power," Indiana Secretary of Commerce Mitch Roob said in a prepared statement.

The Indiana Economic Development Corp. and the Indiana Office of Energy Development note that the state also has a budding wind-turbine-component industry and existing manufacturers with the capability of producing components.

The delegation attending the trade show will include representatives of IEDC, Duke Energy, Hoosier Energy Rural Electric Cooperative Inc., Ice Miller LLP, Krieg DeVault LLP and Indy Partnership

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

ADVANCED SEARCH
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ

  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT