IBJNews

2010 NEWSMAKER: Lubbers changes higher-ed funding

J.K. Wall
December 24, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Year In Review

Teresa Lubbers ushered in a new era in higher education financing this year. But she’ll need to persuade the General Assembly to stick with it in 2011.

Lubbers, Indiana’s commissioner for higher education, cut 2010 funding for Indiana’s seven state-sponsored universities by $150 million, with the most efficient schools getting smaller reductions and less efficient schools larger trims.

The commission defined efficiency mainly by graduation rates and spending per graduate. By those metrics, Ivy Tech Community College came out best and received the smallest cut in funding, 3.7 percent. Indiana State University looked worst, and therefore received the largest cut, 6.6 percent.

The goal of the performance-based funding is to curb universities’ current incentives to boost their state funding merely by signing up new students but instead to show more success at producing graduates.

Teresa Lubbers Lubbers

The percentage of undergraduates who finish in six years ranges from a lowly 43 percent at ISU to 73 percent at Indiana University’s Bloomington campus. The amount of money per graduate spent by each four-year university varies from $87,000 at Ball State University to $111,124 at Purdue University’s West Lafayette campus.

Performance-based funding for universities is not brand new. But the willingness of the commission and Gov. Mitch Daniels to stick to a performance-funding formula even when taking money away from schools caught people’s attention.

“Whenever talk of budget cuts shows its head, usually any talk of performance funding is immediately put down,” said Derek Redelman, education lobbyist for the Indiana Chamber of Commerce.

But Lubbers has shown no signs of turning back. Her agency will recommend that even more funding hinge on universities’ performance during the budget-writing process that will take place in the General Assembly in 2011.

“What it clearly makes is a statement,” Lubbers said, “that this is the direction which we will continue to recommend.”

Lubbers, a former Republican state senator and the wife of former Daniels adviser Mark Lubbers, will have her own party in full control of the budget this year. Republicans, who dominate the Senate, also took a commanding majority in the House of Representatives during the November election.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............

ADVERTISEMENT