IBJOpinion

EDITORIAL: Dodson, Durham take different approach to doing business

 IBJ Staff
December 5, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
IBJ Editorial

This week’s issue features stories about two local businessmen. Both are native Hoosiers in their late 40s who showed entrepreneurial instincts at a young age. But the similarities end there.

Jim Dodson is an unassuming man of 49. He runs a company that helps businesses get discounts on bulk purchases. He got the idea for it in college, where he organized a buying cooperative of fraternities and sororities. The profits went toward student scholarships.

Dodson has used the fruits of his success to help others. When he launched his business, he immediately started setting aside 10 percent of profits for charity.

“There aren’t many companies in the United States that set aside 10 percent of … profits,” said Eugene R. Tempel, president of the Indiana University Foundation. “I think the average is less than 1 percent.”

Dodson also launched the Indiana Achievement Awards, which for 10 years have honored the state’s most effective not-for-profits. The awards have raised the bar for management at not-for-profits and allowed organizations that quietly do excellent work to shine.

Dodson’s idea of a good time: hanging out on the wraparound porch of his home.

Then there’s Tim Durham, 47, a highflier who has made his living buying and selling companies.

Durham has given to charity, but primarily has used the fruits of his success to live lavishly. He owns a 30,000-square-foot home at Geist Reservoir, as well as private jets, dozens of classic cars, and several Picassos. He attends Hugh Hefner’s Playboy parties in Los Angeles and invited 1,000 people to a birthday party for himself.

Durham’s idea of a good time: hanging out on his 100-foot yacht.

In a 2008 Indianapolis Monthly article, Durham said, “They asked me if I consider myself a materialist. I said, ‘Without a doubt! Look around.’ Does anyone not consider himself a materialist? Who doesn’t want stuff? This country is founded on the idea of people wanting stuff.”

Last year, he estimated his net worth at $75 million. In 2004, he told IBJ, “On the day I die, I want to be the richest man in the world.”

Dodson, reflecting on various hardships he has endured, said, “When I look back on my life, I realize I’ve dealt with some very major problems. It’s how you handle them that determines whether you grow as an individual or shrink. I think I’ve managed to grow through problems.”

This month, as reported on page 3A, Dodson is receiving IBJ’s Michael A. Carroll Award for community service.

This month, as reported on page 4A, FBI agents raided the Durham-owned Fair Finance Co. in Ohio, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Indianapolis alleges the business was operating as a Ponzi scheme. Durham, his partners and related firms now owe the company more than $168 million. Investors worry they won’t get their money back.

Both Dodson and Durham are entrepreneurs who were motivated by profit. The difference lies in whether the profit was a means, or an end.•

__________

To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.



ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In my opinion the estridge companies are crooks. They filed bankruptcy on their 'track housing' side of the business two weeks before they closed on one of my clients' homes. When my client first interviewed Estridge as a builder 6 months before, they specifically ASKED about the solvency of their business, knowing that some builders were struggling. Estridge truly misrepresented their financial situation at that time. I suppose I am more unhappy with the whole system than I am with the builder because what the heck==you can file bankruptcy on 'track homes' but still keep building and make money off of 'custom built' homes??? How ridiculous! They are all homes. How can a company be allowed to bilk thousands of dollars from their subcontractors but still be allowed to build houses?? they should have been made to pay back all their unpaid contractors before being allowed to profit from building any more houses! This alone makes them and the system crooks in my eyes. I would never build an estridge home and I would not recommend for my clients either. If they were truly 'bankrupt' how could they afford to keep building homes anyway??? The whole system needs fixed.

  2. I live a couple blocks east of the Angie's campus and my house is assessed for ~$160,000. If I could get that amount, let alone $384,000 (a 140% bonus), I'd sell in a minute. Either Angie's stockholders just got fleeced, or Angie's is getting about a 58% discount on their property taxes, if these properties are actually worth what they paid Mr. Oesterle for them. Which do you think is the case?

  3. Perhaps the IMA board is really to blame! They agreed to hire Charles. They can't seemingly find donors among themselves, or bring in new blood that will support the museums operating budget with an expanded museum and money to provide curators with something to do (ie buy art). The headlines of disarray at the museum and mass firings are hurting the reputation of the museum for some time to come. If people on the board had misgivings, perhaps they shpuld have more forcefully opposed efforts that they have seemingly been unable to fund, like expansion and the costs it has created!

  4. See, I told u Indyman and Dipsicle....this 8 days is overkill. It's barely worth a weekend....great job Tony George! Your dream has been fulfilled....he fans want the I r l back. Thats how good it was.....and that sucked.

  5. I have been in training for a short time now but right off I can see that safety and quality are the number one issues, my experience as of late has been a positive one, the employees along with Jeff the plant manager and the operation supervisor as well as the engineers are a highly motivated group of people, what an asset for the area to have and for company's in need of a quality metal products.

ADVERTISEMENT