IBJOpinion

EDITORIAL: Dodson, Durham take different approach to doing business

 IBJ Staff
December 5, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

This week’s issue features stories about two local businessmen. Both are native Hoosiers in their late 40s who showed entrepreneurial instincts at a young age. But the similarities end there.

Jim Dodson is an unassuming man of 49. He runs a company that helps businesses get discounts on bulk purchases. He got the idea for it in college, where he organized a buying cooperative of fraternities and sororities. The profits went toward student scholarships.

Dodson has used the fruits of his success to help others. When he launched his business, he immediately started setting aside 10 percent of profits for charity.

“There aren’t many companies in the United States that set aside 10 percent of … profits,” said Eugene R. Tempel, president of the Indiana University Foundation. “I think the average is less than 1 percent.”

Dodson also launched the Indiana Achievement Awards, which for 10 years have honored the state’s most effective not-for-profits. The awards have raised the bar for management at not-for-profits and allowed organizations that quietly do excellent work to shine.

Dodson’s idea of a good time: hanging out on the wraparound porch of his home.

Then there’s Tim Durham, 47, a highflier who has made his living buying and selling companies.

Durham has given to charity, but primarily has used the fruits of his success to live lavishly. He owns a 30,000-square-foot home at Geist Reservoir, as well as private jets, dozens of classic cars, and several Picassos. He attends Hugh Hefner’s Playboy parties in Los Angeles and invited 1,000 people to a birthday party for himself.

Durham’s idea of a good time: hanging out on his 100-foot yacht.

In a 2008 Indianapolis Monthly article, Durham said, “They asked me if I consider myself a materialist. I said, ‘Without a doubt! Look around.’ Does anyone not consider himself a materialist? Who doesn’t want stuff? This country is founded on the idea of people wanting stuff.”

Last year, he estimated his net worth at $75 million. In 2004, he told IBJ, “On the day I die, I want to be the richest man in the world.”

Dodson, reflecting on various hardships he has endured, said, “When I look back on my life, I realize I’ve dealt with some very major problems. It’s how you handle them that determines whether you grow as an individual or shrink. I think I’ve managed to grow through problems.”

This month, as reported on page 3A, Dodson is receiving IBJ’s Michael A. Carroll Award for community service.

This month, as reported on page 4A, FBI agents raided the Durham-owned Fair Finance Co. in Ohio, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Indianapolis alleges the business was operating as a Ponzi scheme. Durham, his partners and related firms now owe the company more than $168 million. Investors worry they won’t get their money back.

Both Dodson and Durham are entrepreneurs who were motivated by profit. The difference lies in whether the profit was a means, or an end.•

__________

To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.



ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

  2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

  3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

  4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

  5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.

ADVERTISEMENT