IBJNews

Abound Solar completes financing for Tipton plant

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Abound Solar Inc., a Loveland, Colo.-based manufacturer that plans to open a massive solar-panel plant in Tipton, has raised $110 million from investors and closed on a $400 million government loan guarantee to increase its production capacity, the company announced Tuesday.

In addition, Abound has secured the abandoned Getrag transmission plant site in Tipton by having a developer acquire the property.

A quarter of the $400 million loan guarantee from the Department of Energy will help Abound double annual production at its Longmont, Colo., plant to 200 megawatts by 2012. The rest will be used to complete by 2014 what may become the largest U.S. module factory, with 640 megawatts, in Tipton, the company said. The DOE guarantee was awarded in July.

The company plans to take over the empty Getrag plant on U.S. 31 near Kokomo, creating as many as 1,000 jobs in the next three years. The company has increased its Indiana job-creation estimate by 150 since first announcing its plans in the summer. About 200 workers will be added in Colorado, it said.

The 781,500-square-foot former Getreg facility has been sold for $25 million by Franklin Advisors LLC, an agent appointed by U.S. bankruptcy court to sell the plant and distribute the proceeds to lien holders, including a number of subcontractors that are owed about $44 million.

The buyer of the plant and 106-acre site, W.W. Reynolds Cos. Inc., is a Boulder, Colo.-based real estate developer that will lease the facility to Abound Solar.

The plant has been empty since 2008. Getrag Manufacturing LLC filed for bankruptcy and halted work on the plant after the company's partnership with Chrysler LLC collapsed. The proposed $530 million development has never been used.

Patrick Lindley of local real estate firm Cassidy Turley represented Franklin Advisors in the transaction.

Abound Solar's latest funding round includes existing investors led by Invus Group, and two new backers, BP Plc's alternative energy unit and West Hill Investors, the company said.

"We're beginning the process of scaling up and becoming a major manufacturer," Abound Solar CEO Tom Tiller, 49, said. "We're really pleased that all of our existing shareholders took part and that we were also able to attract two new ones."

U.S. solar manufacturers exported $723 million worth of panels and equipment last year, and domestic sales reached $2.6 billion, the Solar Energy Industry Association said Tuesday in a report.

Tiller said about 90 percent of Abound's sales are in Europe, and most of the production from the expanded factories will be exported to the European region.

Abound now employs about 450 workers, Tiller said.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Exporting ideas now renewable energy
    "90% of all their products are exported to Europe."

    Used to be we only exported our best ideas so the rest of the world could benefit from it.

    Now we're exporting the best long-term solutions to the rest of the world.

    It's great we're exporting vs importing more but we really need to start using these kinds of products here too! Just sayin'

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT