IBJNews

Accountable care 'savior' of doc groups

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indianapolis’ largest independent physician group, American Health Network, doesn’t want to sell to a hospital, but its CEO hopes it can hold on until the remainder of the health reform law kicks in.

Dr. Ben Park said the wave of physician acquisitions the past three years has given area hospitals a new stream of revenue—and therefore the cash to recruit even more physicians. American Health is finding it difficult to match the pay offered by hospitals.

One Indianapolis-area hospital promised $1 million per year in compensation to lure cardiac surgeons, according to an August report by the Center for Studying Health System Change.

American Health doesn’t employ cardiologists, but its bevy of primary care and cancer doctors is still attractive to hospitals that want to lock in a stream of patient referrals from physician offices into the beds and operating rooms they need to fill every day.

American Health lost a group of eight family physicians this summer to Noblesville-based Riverview Hospital and faces similar threats from other hospitals more or less constantly.

As he discusses in the video below, Park is pinning his hopes on accountable care, a key provision of the 2010 health care law, under which the federal Medicare program would reward physicians for keeping patients healthier and therefore needing fewer trips to the hospital. Private health insurers, such as Indianapolis-based WellPoint Inc., are rolling out similar plans in their markets.


“Accountable care really is the savior of primary care organizations and physician groups in general,” Park said, adding, “Economically, the way it works is, you go to the hospital and you take a dollar of savings from them, and you put 50 cents in your pocket and you give the other 50 cents back to Medicare.”

But until accountable care gains traction, Park said, hospitals are getting a bump in revenue. That comes from locking in physician referrals to the hospitals’ facilities. Also, many health plans pay hospital-owned facilities higher rates for ancillary services—blood tests, X-rays, etc.—than they do when those same services are performed in physician-owned facilities.

“Right now hospitals receive a lot more money for the services they provide in terms of ancillaries than what we do. The hospitals essentially utilize that differential to employ physicians,” Park said.

Indeed, Community Health Network has added more than 350 physicians to its stable in the past three years. St. Vincent Health acquired the 130-physician Care Group, in 2010. Indiana University Health has roughly 600 physicians on its payroll now and recently squabbled with Franciscan St. Francis Health over a couple of family doctors in Martinsville.

Some hospital executives acknowledge that the consolidation trend has driven up costs, but they say that budgetary constraints and accountable care will almost certainly curtail their revenue soon.

“There probably was an uptick in the costs as a result of that [consolidation], but that's not sustainable,” said Kevin Speer, chief strategy officer of St. Vincent, during the IBJ Health Care Power Breakfast on Sept. 21. But, he said, the advantage of consolidation is that it will help hospitals and doctors coordinate care, reduce unnecessary and duplicative services, and make prices more transparent. “So I think the cost savings will be realized. I doubt they're being realized today. But in 24 months if we're sitting up here and we haven't realized them something's wrong.”

Park hopes Speer’s timetable for savings proves right. “The sooner the better,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In my opinion the estridge companies are crooks. They filed bankruptcy on their 'track housing' side of the business two weeks before they closed on one of my clients' homes. When my client first interviewed Estridge as a builder 6 months before, they specifically ASKED about the solvency of their business, knowing that some builders were struggling. Estridge truly misrepresented their financial situation at that time. I suppose I am more unhappy with the whole system than I am with the builder because what the heck==you can file bankruptcy on 'track homes' but still keep building and make money off of 'custom built' homes??? How ridiculous! They are all homes. How can a company be allowed to bilk thousands of dollars from their subcontractors but still be allowed to build houses?? they should have been made to pay back all their unpaid contractors before being allowed to profit from building any more houses! This alone makes them and the system crooks in my eyes. I would never build an estridge home and I would not recommend for my clients either. If they were truly 'bankrupt' how could they afford to keep building homes anyway??? The whole system needs fixed.

  2. I live a couple blocks east of the Angie's campus and my house is assessed for ~$160,000. If I could get that amount, let alone $384,000 (a 140% bonus), I'd sell in a minute. Either Angie's stockholders just got fleeced, or Angie's is getting about a 58% discount on their property taxes, if these properties are actually worth what they paid Mr. Oesterle for them. Which do you think is the case?

  3. Perhaps the IMA board is really to blame! They agreed to hire Charles. They can't seemingly find donors among themselves, or bring in new blood that will support the museums operating budget with an expanded museum and money to provide curators with something to do (ie buy art). The headlines of disarray at the museum and mass firings are hurting the reputation of the museum for some time to come. If people on the board had misgivings, perhaps they shpuld have more forcefully opposed efforts that they have seemingly been unable to fund, like expansion and the costs it has created!

  4. See, I told u Indyman and Dipsicle....this 8 days is overkill. It's barely worth a weekend....great job Tony George! Your dream has been fulfilled....he fans want the I r l back. Thats how good it was.....and that sucked.

  5. I have been in training for a short time now but right off I can see that safety and quality are the number one issues, my experience as of late has been a positive one, the employees along with Jeff the plant manager and the operation supervisor as well as the engineers are a highly motivated group of people, what an asset for the area to have and for company's in need of a quality metal products.

ADVERTISEMENT