IBJNews

Adviser who swindled Ball State out of $8M gets 4 years

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An investment adviser was sentenced to four years and three months in prison for defrauding Ball State University out of more than $8 million, some of which prosecutors say he spent on cars and beachfront real estate.

Seth Beoku Betts, 38, was sentenced Thursday in Manhattan federal court. The founder of Betts & Gambles LLC persuaded the university to give him money to invest in collateralized mortgage obligations, directing some of the money to disreputable investment dealers and spending some on himself, the government said.

“He stole a good deal of that money,” U.S. District Judge Shira Scheindlin said as she imposed the sentence. “In short, the money was lost.”

Betts was arrested last year in North Carolina. He pleaded guilty to one count of securities fraud in February.

Betts approached a former director of investments for the school in 2008 to solicit the money, and engaged in a “four-year saga of delay and deception” when she inquired about the funds, prosecutors alleged in a June 3 court filing. A lawyer for Betts, Deveraux Cannick, told the judge his client has made efforts to recover money lost through the bad investments.

Betts, who was alleged to have spent almost $1.5 million of the university’s money to buy a home in Boynton Beach, Fla., “lost everything he’s had on this Earth,” Cannick said.

The defendant, who grew up in Sierra Leone and England and has been in federal custody for the past year, told the judge he was “completely humiliated.”

“For all intents and purposes, I’m a pauper. I’m destitute. I’m broken,” he said.

A representative of Ball State didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment on the sentence.

At the time of Betts’s arrest, the Betts & Gambles website said the company combined both real estate development and investment opportunities that include waterfront properties in North Carolina and a condominium hotel in the Dominican Republic.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • FTFY
    New partner!! Betts, Gambles & Loses
  • Unbelievable!
    How could any intelligent Investment Committee be suckered by a firm with such an obvious(tongue-in-cheek)name that clearly implies a double standard?
  • Betts & Gambles?
    Really, they invested money with a company named "Betts and Gambles"?

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I'm a CPA who works with a wide range of companies (through my firm K.B.Parrish & Co.); however, we work with quite a few car dealerships, so I'm fairly interested in Fatwin (mentioned in the article). Does anyone have much information on that, or a link to such information? Thanks.

    2. Historically high long-term unemployment, unprecedented labor market slack and the loss of human capital should not be accepted as "the economy at work [and] what is supposed to happen" and is certainly not raising wages in Indiana. See Chicago Fed Reserve: goo.gl/IJ4JhQ Also, here's our research on Work Sharing and our support testimony at yesterday's hearing: goo.gl/NhC9W4

    3. I am always curious why teachers don't believe in accountability. It's the only profession in the world that things they are better than everyone else. It's really a shame.

    4. It's not often in Indiana that people from both major political parties and from both labor and business groups come together to endorse a proposal. I really think this is going to help create a more flexible labor force, which is what businesses claim to need, while also reducing outright layoffs, and mitigating the impact of salary/wage reductions, both of which have been highlighted as important issues affecting Hoosier workers. Like many other public policies, I'm sure that this one will, over time, be tweaked and changed as needed to meet Indiana's needs. But when you have such broad agreement, why not give this a try?

    5. I could not agree more with Ben's statement. Every time I look at my unemployment insurance rate, "irritated" hardly describes my sentiment. We are talking about a surplus of funds, and possibly refunding that, why, so we can say we did it and get a notch in our political belt? This is real money, to real companies, large and small. The impact is felt across the board; in the spending of the company, the hiring (or lack thereof due to higher insurance costs), as well as in the personal spending of the owners of a smaller company.

    ADVERTISEMENT