IBJNews

Airport authority sues insurance carrier for $9.2M

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indianapolis Airport Authority is suing an insurance carrier that provided coverage during construction of the airport’s midfield terminal, claiming the company failed to pay millions of dollars the authority incurred following a construction collapse.

Filed this week in U.S. District Court in Indianapolis, the authority’s lawsuit claims Hartford, Conn.-based Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America owes it $9.2 million on a claim it made totaling about $13.4 million.

The authority said it purchased a builder’s risk policy from Travelers for all phases of construction of the $1.2 billion terminal, which began in July 2005.

Less than two years later, on Jan. 24, 2007, a steel-beam collapse jeopardized the terminal’s scheduled opening by pushing back  construction five months and delaying the opening until February 2009, according to the suit.

But because of the efforts and expenses undertaken by the authority to reduce the delay in completion, the project opened in November 2008, about three months earlier than it would have if the authority had not agreed to the additional expenses, the suit said.

The authority’s suit is asking that Traveler’s pay the $9.2 million it incurred to mitigate the delay in opening the terminal. The authority said it paid extra to resolve change orders and claims brought by contractors and consultants, to investigate and inspect the construction site to assess repairs, and for overtime.

A call to Traveler's for comment was not immediately returned Friday morning.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Can your dog sign a marriage license or personally state that he wishes to join you in a legal union? If not then no, you cannot marry him. When you teach him to read, write, and speak a discernible language, then maybe you'll have a reasonable argument. Thanks for playing!

  2. Look no further than Mike Rowe, the former host of dirty jobs, who was also a classically trained singer.

  3. Current law states income taxes are paid to the county of residence not county of income source. The most likely scenario would be some alteration of the income tax distribution formula so money earned in Marion co. would go to Marion Co by residents of other counties would partially be distributed to Marion co. as opposed to now where the entirety is held by the resident's county.

  4. This is more same-old, same-old from a new generation of non-progressive 'progressives and fear mongers. One only needs to look at the economic havoc being experienced in California to understand the effect of drought on economies and people's lives. The same mindset in California turned a blind eye to the growth of population and water needs in California, defeating proposal after proposal to build reservoirs, improve water storage and delivery infrastructure...and the price now being paid for putting the demands of a raucous minority ahead of the needs of many. Some people never, never learn..

  5. I wonder if I can marry him too? Considering we are both males, wouldn't that be a same sex marriage as well? If they don't honor it, I'll scream discrimination just like all these people have....

ADVERTISEMENT