Airport picks team to study re-use of land at old terminal site

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indianapolis Airport Authority board Friday morning approved the hiring of a team of consulants who will recommend how best to redevelop 8,000 acres of airport property, including the former passenger terminal along High School Road.

Their work will “set the vision for the next 30 to 50 years,” said Marsha Stone, the authority’s chief financial officer.

Leading the team will be international aviation consultancy Landrum & Brown, which has previously worked on projects for the authority, including noise management. Landrum has developed a number of plans for top airports including that of Shanghai, China, and Chicago's O’Hare.

Local firms on the team are Indianapolis engineering consulting firm RW Armstrong Associates and local aviation consultancy Aerofinity. Chicago-based Unison Consulting, Cincinnati-based law firm Taft Stettinius & Hollister and St. Louis-based commercial real estate firm Colliers Turley Martin Tucker round out the team.

Airport officials could finalize a contract with the consultants by the end of March.

Last August, airport staff issued a request for qualifications from firms. It  received 14 responses.

Redevelop of airport land has gained new urgency for the airport authority, which opened the new, $1 billion midfield terminal just as the recession hit, curbing air travel and airport revenues, such as airplane landing fees and parking income.  

Airport operating revenues last year came in at $122.8 million, below the nearly $129 million budgeted.  The authority estimates a loss from operations of $40 million versus a projected loss of $29 million.

However, Stone said the authority has more than enough cash on hand and expects to be able to meet expenses, including the approximately $40 million-per-year debt service on the new terminal.

The land-use study will need to balance a number of interests, including economic development and job creation, while minimizing airport debt and maximizing its development revenue—all while preserving at least some of the land for future aviation uses.

“We have to have a revenue stream we can count on,” said Stone.

The authority also must find uses compatible with communities surrounding the airport. Board President Michael Stayton estimated there are at least 25 major stakeholders including municipal and county governments.

The airport authority’s previous master development plan dated to the 1970s and culminated with the completion of the midfield terminal in 2008.

“This is really an important step for the authority. It’s the next chapter,” Stayton said.

Stone said among the considerations for the team will be an “expectation that we try to minimize debt to the authority.”

That will help Indianapolis International contain costs airlines incur to use the airport and continue to make the airport attractive for air service.

The airport’s land use committee, which picked the new team members, also included Don Welsh, CEO of the Indianapolis Convention & Visitors Association, and Scott Miller, CEO of Indianapolis Economic Development Inc.

The newly named team of consultants will look at a number of factors, including federal regulations affecting future airport land use, potential environmental issues, a market assessment of land values, potential public-private partnerships and job creation.

The team is expected to complete its work by the end of this year.

The consultants also will look at future uses based on the “aerotropolis” concept popularized by University of North Carolina management professor John Kasarda. Kasarda will work with the airport to develop a much broader blueprint for the best land use radiating miles from the airport to further make the airport a regional economic development engine.


  • Revedelop the old terminal
    I have tried to talk to the airport authority about locating my aviation business on the Indianapolis Int Airport. The airport authority doesn't want new business, and does everything it can to run away people who WANT to be there!!
  • Gift
    Bart Peterson...the gift that keeps on giving. First he destroyed Wayne Township by moving the airport to Hendricks County. Secondly, with the impending poor economy, it should have never been built.
  • International Terminal
    I think they should convert the old airport into an international terminal. I think with an international terminal, it will produce more growth of the airport as well as more income to help fund other projects within Marion County. More international would include more of a draw to more international companies, hence more jobs for this state, county and surrounding counties.
  • Energy recycle
    Put in an alternative energy installation that will convert all the sound, vibration & wind generated by the airplanes back into electricity. Use that to pay the electric bill at Lucas Oil Stadium.
  • Farm based economy
    with 80 thousand acres, shouldn't we plant something? Could be an awesome "maize maze" from the sky for departing and approaching aircraft passengers - plus, corn & hogs won't mind the noise.
  • Prison
    Turn it into the MCL west annex (Marion County Lockup) I hear they need the room for prisoners. The noise from the airplanes all night long could be part of the punishment.
  • outlet mall restrictions
    There are two reasons why an outlet mall will not work in place of the old terminal. One, outlet stores are not allowed within so many miles of the real stores per the franchise agreements - that is why there are all out of town. Also, land in that area is VERY valuable for future airport use. Once you let it go commercial, you pay 10 times as much to get it back to expand for future uses, like Boeing or transport hubs.
  • Outlet Mall
    I have stated before that a large Outlet Mall, such as "The Mills" franchise (Potomac outisde DC, Opryland in Nashville and so on) would be a great fit for the old Terminal area. The location, near the interstates, the new Terminal and so on would make it a huge draw!

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

    2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

    3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

    4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

    5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............