IBJNews

Airport postal facility to keep on trucking

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The U.S. Postal Service’s lease at its Indianapolis International Airport hub ends next month, but mail operations are likely to continue there anyway.
 
The Indianapolis Airport Authority board on Friday is expected to vote on a lease with Wilmington, Ohio-based LGSTX Distribution Services to continue operations at the hub through at least November 2014.

LGSTX has managed ground-mail services for the postal service at the hub since 2004. The facility employs more than 100 people.

Airport officials announced in April that the Postal Service would vacate the facility by the end of the year.

The postal service’s Eagle Air Express Mail facility shipped packages by aircraft until 2001, when it hired FedEx to handle air mail. The facility, which has 34 dock doors, was then used to handle ground mail shipped by trucks.

LGSTX will use less space, giving the airport the opportunity to market 71,000 square feet of warehouse space to the air-cargo market. Also available will be 35,000 square feet of office space.

LGSTX will lease more than 171,600 square feet and pay annual rent of $654,581. It has options to extend the lease two more years.

Thomas Wright, an LGSTX manager at the facility, said the company hopes to grow activity at the hub.

Also on the Friday agenda for the IAA board is a measure that would authorize staff to negotiate a contract with Indianapolis mechanical and energy services firm Johnson Melloh to operate the airport’s central energy plant.

Five firms, including current operator BHMM LLC, a unit of Citizens Energy, bid on the contract.  


 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT