Amtrak officials reiterate route's importance to repair hub

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Amtrak officials are continuing to emphasize that the future of a repair facility south of Indianapolis could hinge on whether it begins receiving $3.1 million in annual state funding for passenger train service between Indianapolis and Chicago.

Amtrak spokesman Marc Magliari told the Post-Tribune in a story Sunday that without the Hoosier State Line service four days a week, it will be difficult for the repair facility in Beech Grove to compete for business because the trains passing through Indianapolis deliver work to the facility.

IBJ reported the possibility in an Aug. 19 story.

Amtrak officials say the Beech Grove facility repairs 150 to 175 locomotives and passenger coaches a year. It employs more than 550 workers, with an annual budget of more than $100 million and annual payroll of $30 million.

State transportation officials met last week with lawmakers, mayors and other local officials to discuss options of how to keep the Hoosier State Line running. The service could come to an end Oct. 1 unless Indiana comes up with $3.1 million annually to replace operating costs Congress eliminated for lines shorter than 750 miles.

"Our position on this is that we've not been interested in investing in this solely, but if communities along the path are interested in investing in this, it's a possibility," said Will Wingfield, Indiana Department of Transportation spokesman.

If the service ends, that would leave only the Cardinal, a train running three days a week along the same route on its way between Chicago and New York, running through Indiana.

Ricky Burton, the assistant superintendent at the Beech Grove facility, questioned why Indiana has never provided any support to the rail service, since other modes of transportation receives subsidies.

"If the buses had to pay for the roads between here and Chicago, you wouldn't have bus service," Burton said. "And if the airlines had to pay for the airport in Indianapolis, you wouldn't have air service here, either."

Eric Via, a boilermaker at the facility, doesn't see it as a deadly blow if the Hoosier State ends. Just a serious one.

"There's ways around it, but it would definitely hurt it," he said. "It wouldn't exactly shut us down, but it would put us in a bind."

U.S. Rep. Pete Visclosky, D-Ind., whose district is served by the line, said he believes the service is needed.

"I'm disappointed anytime there's a possibility of the loss of public transportation assets," Visclosky said Saturday. "In the future I believe we're going to see more intercity-interurban rail line instead of less."


  • Long haul is more than long haul
    The long haul trains are just as needed as the short distance routes. In fact you can look at a long route as consisting of many short trip possibilities. I have travelled on the Empire Builder all the way to Seattle but most people do not go that far. They are more likely to use some much shorter segment of the route for their trip. Think of Chicago to LaCrosse, WI or Saint Paul to Fargo, or Grand Forks to Minot. And so on across the country. Many of these cities have no other form of public transportation. The Empire builder plays many roles in it's long trip across the northern tier of the US. I would urge "Fantasy Land" to take a trip over one of the longer routes to personally observe the passenger traffic as people get on and off the train all along the line and often in the wee hours of the night.
  • Do what the Tea Party tells you
    Shut it down and move it to Fort Worth, Texas. We have plenty of room, tax incentives, enthusiastic non-union workers, and we're on an Amtrak long-distance route, a medium distance route, and have a commuter rail line as well.
  • we won't miss it til it's gone
    But then it will be too late. People who say it's not needed have never personally needed it. But others do need it, a significant number, and others would use it if they knew more about it. When will we ever learn? When will we ever learn?
  • It's Easy to Guess How This Will Turn Out
    The Department of Highways (incorrectly named Department of Transportation) will team up with our world-class legislature and decide to spend the money on roads. Forward into the past!
  • 3 miles of payvement
    3 million will not even pay to resurface three miles of interstate highway. As far a paying their own way, gas taxes pay for highway construction along with other government funding. Likewise with airlines and ticket fees to pay for airports. 3 million is a bargain to access the only truly world port city of Chicago. Come on Hoosier's think outside our circle the wagon's mentality .
  • Myopic Conservatives
    Once again, myopic conservatives enthralled to the auto industry, airline industry, and other groups opposed to public transit on "principle" have "fixed" a problem that didn't exist, and in doing so, have created multiple new ones. Nowe we're looking at 350 job losses, in addition to being even-less-competitive with other cities and states that still have train service. Newsflash: It makes zero sense to subsidize 750+ mile routes but not regional routes when a regional route is the easiest sell. Consider: A train journey to Chicago is pleasant, you're not groped by the TSA, and you don't have to deal with surly airline employees. It's Win-win-win. As a bonus? It's about a wash with driving and hitting traffic on Chicago's south side, but you can sleep the entire way there. Compare with the logic of subsidizing "long-haul" routes which are better served with air travel, making the subsidy on these long-hauls a complete waste of money because nobody but the unemployed and retired have that kind of time for a "romantic" 2-3 day rail journey.
    • Not so fast...
      "Congress’ decision set a deadline of Oct. 1 for the state to take control of Amtrak and make its decision about a form of transportation that INDOT says uses $80 of government money for every $22 paid by each rider to cover costs." http://www.purdueexponent.org/opinion/article_31803081-1d74-50e6-9268-2a23f8c9934d.html
    • competitive subsidy only
      Now is the chance for the government and business community to man up and demand competitive service with the subsidy. Get Cincy and Louisville on board and we could have decent service opening travel and economic development to Chicago with Indy as a regional transit minihub. Use the subsidy as an incentive for amtrak to upgrade their lines to highspeed capacity, tie it in with the airport and market the heck out of it...

      Post a comment to this story

      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. Socialized medicine works great for white people in Scandanavia. It works well in Costa Rica for a population that is partly white and partly mestizo. I don't really see Obamacare as something aimed against whites. I think that is a Republican canard designed to elicit support from white people for republican candidates who don't care about them any more than democrats care about the non-whites they pander to with their phony maneuvers. But what is different between Costa Rica nd the Scandanavian nations on one hand and the US on the other? SIZE. Maybe the US is just too damn big. Maybe it just needs to be divided into smaller self governing pieces like when the old Holy Roman Empire was dismantled. Maybe we are always trying the same set of solutions for different kinds of people as if we were all the same. Oh-- I know-- that is liberal dogma, that we are all the same. Which is the most idiotic American notion going right back to the propaganda of 1776. All men are different and their differences are myriad and that which is different is not equal. The state which pretends men are all the same is going to force men to be the same. That is what America does here, that is what we do in our stupid overseas wars, that is how we destroy true diversity and true difference, and we are all as different groups of folks, feeling the pains of how capitalism is grinding us down into equally insignificant proletarian microconsumers with no other identity whether we like it or not. And the Marxists had this much right about the War of Independence: it was fundamentally a war of capitalist against feudal systems. America has been about big money since day one and whatever gets in the way is crushed. Health care is just another market and Obamacare, to the extent that it Rationalizes and makes more uniform a market which should actually be really different in nature and delivery from place to place-- well that will serve the interests of the biggest capitalist stakeholders in health care which is not Walmart for Gosh Sakes it is the INSURANCE INDUSTRY. CUI BONO Obamacare? The insurance industry. So republicans drop the delusion pro capitalist scales from your eyes this has almost nothing to do with race or "socialism" it has to do mostly with what the INSURANCE INDUSTRY wants to have happen in order to make their lives and profits easier.

      2. Read the article - the reason they can't justify staying is they have too many medicare/medicaid patients and the re-imbursements for transporting these patient is so low.

      3. I would not vote for Bayh if he did run. I also wouldn't vote for Pence. My guess is that Bayh does not have the stomach to oppose persons on the far left or far right. Also, outside of capitalizing on his time as U. S. Senator (and his wife's time as a board member to several companies) I don't know if he is willing to fight for anything. If people who claim to be in the middle walk away from fights with the right and left wing, what are we left with? Extremes. It's probably best for Bayh if he does not have the stomach for the fight but the result is no middle ground.

      4. JK - I meant that the results don't ring true. I also questioned the 10-year-old study because so much in the "health care system" has changed since the study was made. Moreover, it was hard to get to any overall conclusion or observation with the article. But....don't be defensive given my comments; I still think you do the best job of any journalist in the area shedding light and insight on important health care issues.

      5. Probably a good idea he doesn't run. I for one do not want someone who lives in VIRGINIA to be the governor. He gave it some thought, but he likes Virginia too much. What a name I cannot say on this site! The way these people think and operate amuses me.