IBJNews

Analysis: Obamacare exchanges will push Anthem's premiums lower

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Indiana expects the premiums it charges on the health insurance exchanges being created by Obamacare to be slightly less than they would have been without the law.

That’s the conclusion of an analysis of Anthem’s rate filing with the Indiana Department of Insurance by Indianapolis-based consulting firm HealthCare Options Inc.

The HealthCare Options analysis shows that Anthem’s exchange customers will actually pay nearly $5 per person per month less, on average, than they would have if no elements of Obamacare went into effect next year. That's a savings of $60 per year, even before any of Obamacare's subsidies for low- and moderate-income Hoosiers are factored in.

Instead of paying an average of nearly $412 each month for every member of an Anthem health plan, Anthem expects to charge its customers $407 per member per month. That’s an average savings of $60 per year over what customers would have paid without the benefits of the law, formally known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

These averages will be far different from customers’ actual premiums, which will vary widely based on their age and smoking habits, and a small amount based on the part of Indiana where they live.

Those actual rates look like they’ll come in higher than in many other states, according to an analysis released last week by California-based Kaiser Family Foundation.

“From my review of the Marketplace insurance filings in Indiana, it appears that the average individual premium will not be higher because of the law despite the fact that coverage will be more complete and people cannot be rejected for coverage,” wrote Dave Kelleher, president of HealthCare Options, in an emailed statement. “Although the premiums in Indiana are higher than in a number of other states, on balance, this is good news for most Indiana consumers."

Kelleher’s findings are at odds with the message sent out in July by the Indiana Department of Insurance when it announced Obamacare would drive up individual premiums in Indiana by 72 percent. That’s because the insurance department analyzed Anthem’s filing based on the total amount of claims its plans could pay, based on the benefits that Obamacare will require them to cover.

But Kelleher’s analysis focuses on what Anthem actually expects to happen once Obamacare requires all Hoosiers to buy health insurance and blows up the myriad pools of customers that now exist in the individual insurance market in favor of one predominant risk pool.

Because of those changes, Anthem expects a slightly sicker level of patients to sign up for coverage than before. Actuaries call this higher “morbidity.” Anthem’s actuaries expect morbidity in the exchanges that is 19 percent higher than what it would have been.

However, that figure is misleading because Anthem expects that Obamacare will cause consumer behavior in general to change. The requirement to buy insurance and the pooling of risk prompted Anthem’s actuaries to expect that the exchanges will operate much more like small employers, with two to five workers, do now.

The big difference now between the individual market and the small-group market is that the health status of the small-group market is generally better. Individual customers typically have health risks that are 30 percent higher than what Anthem sees among small employers. The smallest employers, those with two to five workers, have workers with health risks just 3 percent higher than all small employers do.

Anthem’s switch to use small employers as the baseline of its cost estimates entirely offsets the higher premiums that would have been charged because of the 19-percent rise in morbidity. That’s the big thing that leads to such a different expectation than the Insurance Department produced.

(To see it more clearly, see Page 2 of this spreadsheet.)

“Individuals will have more options and can make individual purchasing decisions that fit their needs, resulting in higher-risk individuals being more likely to opt in than the lower-risk population in 2014,” wrote Anthem’s actuaries, affirming a critique of Obamacare advanced by its conservative opponents.

“On the other hand,” Anthem’s actuaries added, “the bigger Small Groups are less subject to adverse selection [i.e., only sick people signing up for benefits] since the purchasing decision is being made at the group level, contributing to better average morbidity in Small Group.”

In other words, Anthem’s actuaries expect Obamacare’s basic bet to work: that by requiring everyone to have insurance, more healthy people will sign up, thus lowering the overall risk and premiums in the individual market.

Of course, Obamacare also requires richer benefits than were required before in Indiana. Those richer benefits are what boosted predicted costs 72 percent in the Insurance Department’s analysis.

But Anthem expects its customers to choose different types of plans than before, many with higher levels of cost-sharing or less-generous drug benefits. And because of those choices, Anthem expects, on average, that Obamacare’s requirements for richer benefits will add nothing to overall premiums.

What will add to the cost of coverage is simply the continued rise in the cost of medical care. Anthem expects the cost of health care to rise 24 percent over 2012.

But other changes wrought by Obamacare will help mitigate those increases. First of all, the law requires Anthem to keep its administrative costs to no more than 20 percent—or else rebate the difference to customers. Anthem’s overhead costs were 29 percent in 2011, the year the rebate requirement took effect.

Second, Obamacare establishes a “transitional reinsurance fund,” which will pay Anthem and its peers to offset the rise in morbidity. Such a rise is expected because of Obamacare’s individual mandate, which requires all Americans to obtain health insurance, or else pay a tax.

That provision alone will reduce premiums in Indiana 12 percent from what they would have been.

When asked about HealthCare Options’ analysis, Anthem referred to a March study by the Society of Actuaries, which predicted premiums for individuals' health insurance in Indiana would rise 68 percent because of Obamacare.

Anthem spokesman Tony Felts also said HealthCare Options had made a mistake by assuming that Anthem’s rates of retention of customers would hold steady. It’s not clear whether correcting those assumptions would have significantly altered the conclusion Kelleher reached.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Why did my preimum go up 70%
    I just got an Anthem quote today $454. to $773 a 70% increase.
  • Bad News has Arrived Today from Anthem
    This article sure missing the mark. My wife is age 62 her Anthem Monthly premium WAS $640 per month. In today's mail from Anthem it says her Obama version premium will be $879 per month beginning on Jan 1st, 2014. Sure doesn't sound like any savings to me!! John
    • Good News
      This is good news for Indiana and for the Hoosiers that buy outside the exchange. The policies inside the exchange should help to make health insurance more affordable.
    • Anthem
      The key will be how many young healthy individuals sign up for coverage. Their premium dollars (and low claims!) are badly needed to keep rates stable for everybody else.
    • Good news despite ideologues in pence administration
      Where are the amateurs in the pence administration who incorrectly and erroneously have claimed that the end of the world was near with obamacare? Now that the marketplace is really starting to work, we are finding that, finally, rate relief is on the way. No thanks to the idelogical morons in state govt

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      thisissue1-092914.jpg 092914

      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. Here are a few candidates for this new group, "ripped from the headlines." First up, that bizzaro State Senator Brent Waltz; secondly, the unethical Todd Huston, and his contractual arrangements scheme; Finally, but not least of all, the dishonorable Eric Turner. What sayeth you Greg Zoeller?

      2. Good day. I can't hide this great testimony that take place in my life I will love everyone to know it and be partaker that is why I always place it on answer, I am Mrs,Natalie Cuttaia by name, I live in Texas, United State Of America, I want to thank (Mr.Bruce Brandon) for his kindness upon my family life. I never knew that there is still nice lender like this on internet and earth here. Just some Months Back, I was in search for a loan of $100,000,00 as I was running out of money for feeding and rent. I was scammed $6,800 Dollars and I decided not to involve my self in such business again but a Friend of my introduced me to a loan firm due to my appearance and doings. And I told him that I am not interested of any loan deal anymore but he told me that there is still a nice lender who he will recommend me to, and I made a trial and I am most grateful lucky am I today, I was given a loan amount of $100,000.00usd, by this great Company (Bruce Brandon Loan Company) managed by (Mr.Bruce Brandon) If you are in need of a genuine or legit loan or financial assistance and you can be reliable and trusted of capable of paying back at the due time of the funds I will advice you to, contact him via: ( bruce.brandon071@gmail.com ) And you will be free from scams in the internet. All thanks to Mr.Bruce Brandon You are the one who remove me and my family out of poverty. The reason why i am doing this is that, i promise Mr.Bruce Brandon that if i truly got my loan, i will advertize his company and bring customers to his company. Contact him via ( bruce.brandon071@gmail.com )for the Loan you have been looking for..

      3. Hello, We are firm Organization formed to help people in needs of helps,such as financial help. So if you are going through financial difficulty or you are in any financial mess,and you need funds to start up your own business,or you need loan to settle your debt or pay off your bills,start a nice business, or you are finding it hard to obtain capital loan from local banks,contact us today via email mrsroseberrywilkinsfunds.usa@gmail.com So do not let these opportunity pass you by because Jesus is the same yesterday, today and forever more. Please these is for serious minded and God fearing People. Your Name: Loan Amount: Loan Duration: Valid Cell Phone Number: Thanks for your understanding to your contact as we Await Regards Management Email:mrsroseberrywilkinsfunds.usa@gmail.com

      4. The question is, where could they build a new stadium? It seems in the past year, all the prime spots have been spoken for with potential projects. Maybe in the industrial wasteland area a block past Lucas Oil? I think it needs to be close to the core, if a new stadium is built.

      5. Aldi is generally a great shopping experience. Still, I'm sure YOU wouldn't want to shop there, which I consider a positive.

      ADVERTISEMENT