IBJNews

Anderson superintendent proposes closing Wigwam

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Anderson's school superintendent has proposed closing the city's most famous landmark — the Wigwam gym complex that is the world's second-largest high school basketball venue — as part of a plan that also includes cutting 65 teachers' jobs.

Closing and selling the iconic gym was one of the recommendations Superintendent Felix Chow listed at a school board meeting Tuesday, The Herald Bulletin reported.

The 9,000-seat Wigwam, built in 1962 on Anderson High School's campus, is the second largest such venue in the world, ranked behind the Fieldhouse in New Castle.

But the aging structure, which was mostly recently renovated in 2002, is also a drain on the Anderson Community Schools' budget. The district paid nearly $350,000 in utility bills for the gym in 2008, while it generated less than $8,000 from events, including a campaign stop by Hillary Rodham Clinton that attracted more than 6,000 people.

School officials have discussed closing the Wigwam before, but never received board approval. Supporters see the gym as a rich trove of Indiana basketball lore, and the gym even has its own fan website.

Closing the Wigwam is just part of the five-year plan Chow unveiled Tuesday. Chow's plan also includes cutting 82 jobs including 65 teacher positions, introducing all-day kindergarten and basing grade promotions on students' competence.

The plan is designed to meet school board goals that include eliminating the district's budget deficit by 2015.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Wigwam
    @BerwickGuy, the knuckleheads are the people that keep a facility open when they can't afford to run it. Anderson doesn't have the population anymore to fill such a building, the schools are underperforming, and they are practically broke. Is their priority maintaining a building or providing education?
  • Hate to see the day
    No way they only made $8,000 from events...that is not the whole balance sheet for certain. Having said that, I am sure they are nowhere remotely near break even. There are alternative classes held there, offices for some staff...none of that is being mentioned here. That is part of the reason utility bills are high there...they are trying to imply that it is just 11 basketball games a year and nothing else...it is used much more than that, and for actual schooling. Having said that, it is a giant building, and a memorial to a time that no longer exists...there is no way to justify keeping it open on a cost basis...you can only justify it on an historical, sentimental or anthropological basis...unless you can tap grant money, or make it some sort of historical landmark eligible for Gov't funds, there is no way to pay for it in this era of reduced budgets and tax caps. I have seen literally hundreds of games in that building, and I love it...but it is most likely well past time to follow the superintendent's recommendation. Sad, but true.
  • $8000 ??!?!?!?!?
    How did they only make $8K.

    AHS probably play 12 or so home games a year at probably $5 a ticket. If only 1000 people show up per game that is $60K in revenue.

    Its a shame (or rather a sad joke) that gym isnt used by the IHSAA for any tournament games any more. I used to go and see 8000 people going crazy for sectional / regional games....of course, that's when people actually cared about HS Ball in the state.
  • Wigwam Deserves Better Fate
    Putting aside its day-to-day usefulness, the Wigwam is a historic landmark. If you can't sell it, are you then just going to mothball it and let it fall into disrepair? And, who will buy it?? Chow is not thinking...the idea sounds good, but no way is it practical.
  • Wigwam
    Just one more proof of the fact that knuckleheads are in charge. No wonder our schools get so much criticism, it's not the teachers, it is the pinheaded administrations with no guts, sense, or ability to use any common sense.
  • Confused
    Only $8,000 from events??? How can that be possible? If they sold basketball tickets for $1 apiece and only sold 800 seats per game they would make $8,000. Am I missing something?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT