IBJNews

Another veteran justice leaving Indiana Supreme Court

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Longtime Indiana Supreme Court Justice Frank Sullivan Jr. announced Monday that he is stepping down after nearly 19 years on the court to accept a teaching post at Indiana University's law school in Indianapolis.

News of Sullivan's impending departure came hours after the court's newest member, Mark Massa, was sworn in as the 107th Supreme Court justice by the man he replaced on the five-member court, former Chief Justice Randall Shepard. Massa, who had been Daniels' chief counsel in the governor's office from 2006 to 2010, took the oath during a private ceremony Monday morning.

Sullivan, 62, said his departure had been in the works since last fall, when he began talks with the Robert H. McKinney School of Law about a teaching position. He said he signed a teaching agreement last Tuesday, but will remain on the court until near the start of the fall semester.

"I've been here almost 19 years now and I'm sort of reaching an age when I thought that if I was going to do one more big thing before I retired, I probably ought to be getting about it," said Sullivan, who was state budget director under Democratic Gov. Evan Bayh before Bayh appointed him to the five-member court in 1993.

Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels will choose Sullivan's replacement from candidates selected by the Indiana Judicial Nominating Commission. It'll be Daniels third appointment to the court, following Massa and the 2010 appointment of Steven David, a decorated Army officer who once served as chief defense counsel for Guantanamo Bay detainees. David replaced Justice Theodore Boehm, who retired.

McKinney School of Law Dean Gary R. Roberts said he expects Sullivan, who was an adjunct professor at the school from 2007-2009, to teach classes in business law and corporate finance.

"Having Frank Sullivan join our faculty is an exciting and extraordinary opportunity to bring in someone with a great mind and academic temperament to teach our students both theory and practice and to add to our scholarly culture," Roberts said in statement.

Sullivan said he hopes female lawyers and judges will apply for the vacancy, adding that he believes the state's high court should better reflect the state's population.

Indiana has had only one female justice in the state's history — Myra Selby, who served for five years before stepping down in 1999.

Under the state constitution the Indiana Supreme Court can have no fewer than five and no more than nine members. The General Assembly would have to act to add justices to the court. Sullivan said he would prefer that the court had seven members because the state "is big enough and complicated enough and diverse enough."

Sullivan graduated from Dartmouth College in 1972 and the Indiana University Maurer School of Law-Bloomington in 1982. He and his wife, Cheryl, have three adult sons. Sullivan is an avid runner who has competed in the Boston Marathon three times in the last decade.

The Indiana Judicial Nominating Commission will select a new chief justice from among the court's five members.

Acting Chief Justice Brent E. Dickson said Sullivan was the "driving force" behind the state Supreme Court's electronic case management system, called Odyssey, that shares information online at no cost.

"Justice Sullivan's many accomplishments as a jurist and a judicial leader will long be remembered with gratitude," Dickson said in a statement.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In my opinion the estridge companies are crooks. They filed bankruptcy on their 'track housing' side of the business two weeks before they closed on one of my clients' homes. When my client first interviewed Estridge as a builder 6 months before, they specifically ASKED about the solvency of their business, knowing that some builders were struggling. Estridge truly misrepresented their financial situation at that time. I suppose I am more unhappy with the whole system than I am with the builder because what the heck==you can file bankruptcy on 'track homes' but still keep building and make money off of 'custom built' homes??? How ridiculous! They are all homes. How can a company be allowed to bilk thousands of dollars from their subcontractors but still be allowed to build houses?? they should have been made to pay back all their unpaid contractors before being allowed to profit from building any more houses! This alone makes them and the system crooks in my eyes. I would never build an estridge home and I would not recommend for my clients either. If they were truly 'bankrupt' how could they afford to keep building homes anyway??? The whole system needs fixed.

  2. I live a couple blocks east of the Angie's campus and my house is assessed for ~$160,000. If I could get that amount, let alone $384,000 (a 140% bonus), I'd sell in a minute. Either Angie's stockholders just got fleeced, or Angie's is getting about a 58% discount on their property taxes, if these properties are actually worth what they paid Mr. Oesterle for them. Which do you think is the case?

  3. Perhaps the IMA board is really to blame! They agreed to hire Charles. They can't seemingly find donors among themselves, or bring in new blood that will support the museums operating budget with an expanded museum and money to provide curators with something to do (ie buy art). The headlines of disarray at the museum and mass firings are hurting the reputation of the museum for some time to come. If people on the board had misgivings, perhaps they shpuld have more forcefully opposed efforts that they have seemingly been unable to fund, like expansion and the costs it has created!

  4. See, I told u Indyman and Dipsicle....this 8 days is overkill. It's barely worth a weekend....great job Tony George! Your dream has been fulfilled....he fans want the I r l back. Thats how good it was.....and that sucked.

  5. I have been in training for a short time now but right off I can see that safety and quality are the number one issues, my experience as of late has been a positive one, the employees along with Jeff the plant manager and the operation supervisor as well as the engineers are a highly motivated group of people, what an asset for the area to have and for company's in need of a quality metal products.

ADVERTISEMENT