IBJNews

Appeals court rules on anonymous online comment case

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Court of Appeals on Tuesday ordered a Marion County judge to reconsider whether The Indianapolis Star must identify an online user who posted an anonymous comment that now is part of a defamation lawsuit.

Jeffrey M. Miller, former CEO of Junior Achievement of Central Indiana, sued JA; its current CEO, Jennifer Burk; and Central Indiana Community Foundation and its president, Brian Payne, for defamation in March 2010 after IBJ and other media outlets ran stories about JA and Miller. He later added as defendants about a dozen people who made anonymous comments about the coverage on news organization websites.

After a Star article on JA facing questions about an audit tied to funding for a building project, anonymous poster “DownWithTheColts” wrote, “This is not JA’s responsibility. They need to look at the FORMER president of JA and others on the [Foundation] board. The 'missing' money can be found in their bank accounts.”

Marion Superior Judge S.K. Reid last year ordered IBJ, the Star and WTRV-TV Channel 6 to identify people who posted comments on their websites; only the Star refused to comply. At issue is whether the Star has to provide Miller information to help him identify “DownWithTheColts.”

The appellate judges decided that the heart of the case is whether “DownWithTheColts” is “the source of any information” provided to a news outlet under Indiana’s Shield Law. The judges compared the online comment forum to that of a bulletin board outside of the Star’s office building that asks for anyone to tack an announcement.

The newspaper did not use the comment by “DownWithTheColts” to write its story or as a lead for another story, the panel said. And an anonymous commenter is not a source as envisioned by Indiana’s Shield Law, wrote Judge Nancy Vaidik.

The judges then reviewed anonymous speech rights under the state and federal constitutions. They found that the statement made by “DownWithTheColts” is defamatory, but Miller has not yet proven that it is false, which Vaidik wrote is necessary for his defamation claim to move forward. And it will be impossible for Miller to prove actual malice under Indiana law without the identity of “DownWithTheColts.”

“While we do not want defamatory commenters to hide behind the First Amendment protection of anonymous speech, we must balance the prospect of too readily revealing the identity of these anonymous commenters,” she wrote.

The judges ordered Reid to apply the so-called Dendrite test, which comes from a New Jersey case involving anonymous commenters on a Yahoo! message board, saying it draws the most appropriate balance between protecting anonymous speech and preventing defamatory speech. But because of Indiana's requirement to prove actual malice, the judges modified the test to require Miller to produce prima facie evidence to support only those elements of his cause that are not dependent on the commenter’s identity. Preliminary evidence of actual malice is not required.

The COA sent the case back to the trial court to apply the modified version of the Dendrite test under both the federal and state constitutions to determine if Miller has satisfied the requirements for obtaining the identity of “DownWithTheColts.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Free Speech
    I have been away for a while. Is this still the United States of America? I cannot really tell from the article. If anyone reading this is aware of sudden changes to our Constitution, Bill of Rights, and the Declaration of Independence, please post an update. Thank you in advance, if you are still called an American Citizen. If we are still free, and our First Amendment Rights are in place, I offer, "Praise the Lord".
  • guess who?
    I ain't seen nothing... I ain't saying nothing!
    • Anonymous Kicks @ss!
      Long live Anonymous!

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. A Tilted Kilt at a water park themed hotel? Who planned that one? I guess the Dad's need something to do while the kids are on the water slides.

    2. Don't come down on the fair for offering drinks. This is a craft and certainly one that belongs in agriculture due to ingredients. And for those worrying about how much you can drink. I'm sure it's more to do with liability than anything else. They don't want people suing for being over served. If you want a buzz, do a little pre-drinking before you go.

    3. I don't drink but go into this "controlled area" so my friend can drink. They have their 3 drink limit and then I give my friend my 3 drink limit. How is the fair going to control this very likely situation????

    4. I feel the conditions of the alcohol sales are a bit heavy handed, but you need to realize this is the first year in quite some time that beer & wine will be sold at the fair. They're starting off slowly to get a gauge on how it will perform this year - I would assume if everything goes fine that they relax some of the limits in the next year or couple of years. That said, I think requiring the consumption of alcohol to only occur in the beer tent is a bit much. That is going to be an awkward situation for those with minors - "Honey, I'm getting a beer... Ok, sure go ahead... Alright see you in just a min- half an hour."

    5. This might be an effort on the part of the State Fair Board to manage the risk until they get a better feel for it. However, the blanket notion that alcohol should not be served at "family oriented" events is perhaps an oversimplification. and not too realistic. For 15 years, I was a volunteer at the Indianapolis Air Show, which was as family oriented an event as it gets. We sold beer donated by Monarch Beverage Company and served by licensed and trained employees of United Package Liquors who were unpaid volunteers. And where did that money go? To central Indiana children's charities, including Riley Hospital for Children! It's all about managing the risk.

    ADVERTISEMENT