IBJNews

Study: Arthritis drug co-developed by Lilly shows promise

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Incyte Corp. says a study of an experimental pill developed with Eli Lilly and Co. for rheumatoid arthritis showed the drug reduces inflammation in patients’ joints at all doses.

At the highest dose of 10 milligrams, 72 percent of patients taking the drug daily had a 20-percent reduction in joint swelling after 24 weeks, 44 percent had a 50-percent drop and 28 percent had a 70-percent decline, Wilmington, Del.-based Incyte said in a prepared statement. By comparison, 32 percent of patients taking placebos had a 20-percent drop in inflammation, 13 percent had a 50-percent decline and 3 percent had a 70-percent drop, the company said.

The drug, previously known as INCB28050, will be called LY3009104, and Indianapolis-based Lilly will be responsible for future clinical trials, Incyte said in its statement. Headache, upper respiratory tract infections, and diarrhea were the most frequently reported side effects mentioned by the 125 patients who took part in the study, the company said.

Lilly paid $90 million in 2009 to acquire the global rights to the treatment in a bid to beef up its pipeline of medications for autoimmune diseases. If the drug makes it to market, Lilly could pay another $665 million to Incyte for reaching various milestones along the way.

The latest study results suggest that “the compound has the potential to become a welcome addition” to current therapies, said Maria Greenwald, a Palm Desert, Calif., rheumatologist who led the study. The findings were released Thursday at the American College of Rheumatology meeting in Atlanta.

In rheumatoid arthritis, the body’s immune system attacks itself, causing joint inflammation and swelling that can lead to progressive destruction of the joints. The disease affects about 1 percent of the world’s population.

The pill is one of a family of experimental treatments for rheumatoid arthritis targeting a protein called JAK that leads to joint destruction. Pfizer Inc. also reported results showing an experimental JAK-targeted medicine that reduced pain and inflammation in a trial released at the rheumatology meeting.

Three biotechnology companies are developing JAK drugs: Incyte, Rigel Pharmaceuticals Inc. of San Francisco, Calif., and Cambridge, Mass.-based Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So as I read this the one question that continues to come to me to ask is. Didn't Indiana only have a couple of exchanges for people to opt into which were very high because we really didn't want to expect the plan. So was this study done during that time and if so then I can understand these numbers. I also understand that we have now opened up for more options for hoosiers to choose from. Please correct if I'm wrong and if I'm not why was this not part of the story so that true overview could be taken away and not just parts of it to continue this negative tone against the ACA. I look forward to the clarity.

  2. It's really very simple. All forms of transportation are subsidized. All of them. Your tax money already goes toward every single form of transportation in the state. It is not a bad thing to put tax money toward mass transit. The state spends over 1,000,000,000 (yes billion) on roadway expansions and maintenance every single year. If you want to cry foul over anything cry foul over the overbuilding of highways which only serve people who can afford their own automobile.

  3. So instead of subsidizing a project with a market-driven scope, you suggest we subsidize a project that is way out of line with anything that can be economically sustainable just so we can have a better-looking skyline?

  4. Downtowner, if Cummins isn't getting expedited permitting and tax breaks to "do what they do", then I'd be happy with letting the market decide. But that isn't the case, is it?

  5. Patty, this commuter line provides a way for workers (willing to work lower wages) to get from Marion county to Hamilton county. These people are running your restaurants, hotels, hospitals, and retail stores. I don't see a lot of residents of Carmel working these jobs.

ADVERTISEMENT