IBJOpinion

MARCUS: Transportation tells us about economy

Morton Marcus
September 5, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Morton Marcus

It was a shameless act. I invited myself to a national conference on transportation held by FTR Associates in Indianapolis. FTR (Freight Transportation Research) monitors and forecasts freight movements to assist transportation companies and their manufacturing suppliers. In good Hoosier tradition, this sophisticated group is headquartered on Grandma Barnes Road outside Nashville in Brown County.

Along with approximately 170 attendees, I found the FTR conference exceptionally informative. Here was clear proof that our many national concerns are manifest in the widespread transportation industry. The level of economic activity determines the demand for transportation services and equipment. The North American Free Trade Agreement and globalization have changed what moves and how. Health issues have caused the federal government to link commercial drivers’ licensing to the body mass index. Environmental regulations have shaped the industry and promise to reshape it again.

The invocation was the economic outlook offered by William Strauss, an economist from the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. His extensive presentation was an excellent review of how we got where we are and a reasoned examination of the recovery ahead. He made it clear that no one should compare this recession to the Great Depression of the 1930s. We are “not in the same city, let alone in the same ballpark,” Strauss said.

Perhaps the most important of Strauss’ predictions was a coming shortage of housing. He found deferred household formation as the pent-up demand that will break forth when employment and income-generating opportunities improve. The current annual rate of housing construction, at 500,000 units, is declining toward the replacement rate of 300,000 units. With home construction a relatively easy market to enter, housing could come back quickly, if (always the if) financing is readily available to developers and home buyers.   

However, the following speakers were not as optimistic. Some saw no recovery in the next year and others doubted that a bottom to the recession has been reached. This is normal. Business analysts often are most cautious and want “real” evidence of recovery before they acknowledge a turnaround. Economists seek signs and omens that appear as shadows in the foggy future.

“Real” evidence does not come until a rise in shipments is sustained. For each business operator, there is no recovery until it shows itself on the top and bottom lines of the income statement. For economists, the bottom is at hand when the rate of decline slows. In other terms, the rain may continue to fall, before the sun shines, but the torrential cloudburst is over.

One motif that went unchallenged during the sessions was that the transportation industry suffers from excess capacity. This was seen as particularly true in trucking, where continued downward pressure on prices is forced by eager competitors. Some trucking firms are “zombies” kept in business by banks that do not want to foreclose on equipment they cannot sell at prices to cover the outstanding loans. Nonetheless, many minor bankruptcies are anticipated and one carrier that has 20 percent of the less-than-truckload market is expected to restructure dramatically or leave the business.

In the rail sector, there are an estimated 750,000 rail cars parked on sidings, with many being stripped for replacement parts, one speaker said. The problem is the desperate decline in automobile shipments in North America coupled with decreased intercontinental trade.

Of particular interest to Hoosiers were the cross-claims about the future of coal. Will coal continue to be king or will environmental concerns topple the throne?

For truck, rail and barge lines, plus their suppliers, this is a major question that will shape their businesses in the decades ahead. While the railroads toot their horns about their environmentally friendly freight services, trucking advocates point out deficiencies in their arguments. It was a lively exchange, in the midst of an engaging conference, significant far beyond the walls of the meeting room.•

__________

Marcus taught economics for more than 30 years at Indiana University and is the former director of IU’s Business Research Center. His column appears weekly. He can be reached at mmarcus@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Can your dog sign a marriage license or personally state that he wishes to join you in a legal union? If not then no, you cannot marry him. When you teach him to read, write, and speak a discernible language, then maybe you'll have a reasonable argument. Thanks for playing!

  2. Look no further than Mike Rowe, the former host of dirty jobs, who was also a classically trained singer.

  3. Current law states income taxes are paid to the county of residence not county of income source. The most likely scenario would be some alteration of the income tax distribution formula so money earned in Marion co. would go to Marion Co by residents of other counties would partially be distributed to Marion co. as opposed to now where the entirety is held by the resident's county.

  4. This is more same-old, same-old from a new generation of non-progressive 'progressives and fear mongers. One only needs to look at the economic havoc being experienced in California to understand the effect of drought on economies and people's lives. The same mindset in California turned a blind eye to the growth of population and water needs in California, defeating proposal after proposal to build reservoirs, improve water storage and delivery infrastructure...and the price now being paid for putting the demands of a raucous minority ahead of the needs of many. Some people never, never learn..

  5. I wonder if I can marry him too? Considering we are both males, wouldn't that be a same sex marriage as well? If they don't honor it, I'll scream discrimination just like all these people have....

ADVERTISEMENT