Daniels says ‘right-to-work’ law would help Indiana

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Gov. Mitch Daniels says Indiana could see an economic boost from a contentious "right-to-work" proposal, but stopped short of saying he wants state legislators to approve it.

A legislative study committee voted 5-4 along party lines last week to support a proposal that would prohibit workers from being required to pay union representation fees. A bill on the issue sparked this year's five-week walkout by House Democrats.

The Republican governor told the Kokomo Tribune's editorial board on Thursday that a "right-to-work" law would make the state more competitive.

"We know there is about a quarter of the opportunities that won't look at us because of the lack of this law," Daniels said.

While Daniels hasn't publicly endorsed the proposal, his state commerce secretary testified in favor of it during a study committee meeting in July.

Opponents maintain that such a law is simply an attack on labor unions that would depress wages and do nothing to attract good jobs.

Daniels disputes that.

"Some will say the average wage in right-to-work states is lower, that's right but they've been adding jobs and income faster than the rest of the country," he said. "Every state needs jobs, and we're no different. If there are reasons not to proceed, that is not the reason."

Thousands of union members attended protest rallies at the Statehouse during the Democratic boycott that halted legislative action.

Daniels expects another heated debate during the 2012 session that starts in January.

"Up to a point that's fine, but obviously I don't agree when people who try to wreck the whole process, really subvert democracy," he said. "Noise and expression of strong disagreement is perfectly fine, but last year they went too far. I hope we don't go through that again."

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In