IBJNews

Arts group names president

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Arts Council of Indianapolis today named longtime staff member David Lawrence as its president.

Lawrence, who has been acting president since Greg Charleston stepped down in July, continues the task of leading an organization that’s seen its funding fall dramatically in the past year.

“It’s requiring us to move in a new direction,” Lawrence said. “We are poised and ready to do that.”

The council is the city's main arts grant-making and advocacy organization. In 2008, it received $5.75 million from public and private sources, and passed $2.68 million of that to local groups and individual artists through various grant programs.

Because of cuts in state and local funding, the council’s budget this year is $3.9 million and will drop to $3 million in 2010.

Lawrence said the council is awaiting word on a new source of private funding, and he predicted some “bold moves” in 2010.

“We’re going to work to hone our programs and services, and make sure we meet the needs of the arts community. We recognize that the times have changed.”

The council’s board of directors conducted a national search for Charleston’s replacement. Board member Dan Appel said Lawrence was chosen “because he presented some incredibly insightful, imaginative and compelling ideas to further the mission of the Arts Council of Indianapolis.”

Lawrence joined the Arts Council in 1999 and became vice president in 2005. His main role has been overseeing grant programs.

Lawrence said his salary is being negotiated. His predecessor earned $160,119 in 2008, and Lawrence was paid $109,769.

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Gay marriage is coming, whether or not these bigots and zealots like it or not. We must work to ensure future generations remember the likes of Greg Zoeller like they do the racists of our past...in shame.

  2. Perhaps a diagram of all the network connections of all politicians to their supporters and those who are elite/wealthy and how they have voted on bills that may have benefited their supporters. The truth may hurt, but there are no non-disclosures in government.

  3. I'm sure these lawyers were having problems coming up with any non-religious reason to ban same-sex marriage. I've asked proponents of this ban the question many times and the only answers I have received were religious reasons. Quite often the reason had to do with marriage to a pet or marriage between a group even though those have nothing at all to do with this. I'm looking forward to less discrimination in our state soon!

  4. They never let go of the "make babies" argument. It fails instantaneously because a considerable percentage of heterosexual marriages don't produce any children either. Although if someone wants to pass a law that any couple, heterosexual or homosexual, cannot be legally married (and therefore not utilize all legal, financial, and tax benefits that come with it) until they have produced a biological child, that would be fun to see as a spectator. "All this is a reflection of biology," Fisher answered. "Men and women make babies, same-sex couples do not... we have to have a mechanism to regulate that, and marriage is that mechanism." The civil contract called marriage does NOTHING to regulate babymaking, whether purposefully or accidental. These conservatives really need to understand that sex education and access to birth control do far more to regulate babymaking in this country. Moreover, last I checked, same-sex couples can make babies in a variety of ways, and none of them are by accident. Same-sex couples often foster and adopt the children produced by the many accidental pregnancies from mixed-sex couples who have failed at self-regulating their babymaking capabilities.

  5. Every parent I know with kids from 6 -12 has 98.3 on its car radio all the time!! Even when my daughter isn't in the car I sometimes forget to change stations. Not everybody wants to pay for satellite radio. This will be a huge disappointment to my 9 year old. And to me - there's so many songs on the radio that I don't want her listening to.

ADVERTISEMENT