IBJOpinion

Arts groups support each other

July 3, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Letters To The Editor

We are writing to give our wholehearted endorsement to [columnist] Greg Morris’ appeal for generous support for the Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra (“Confessions of a symphony newbie,” June 21).

The ISO’s current financial difficulties reflect issues and business models affecting symphonic organizations throughout the United States—and so we hope our region will step up and show that here, in central Indiana, we know the value of our arts organizations and are committed to their future.

At the Center for the Performing Arts in Carmel, we show our support—as Morris notes—by offering the orchestra a wonderful new stage, and the chance to reach new audiences, at The Palladium, the only true concert hall that the ISO and its fans will find in this part of the country. In fact, the ISO will be one of the many arts organizations helping us tune the hall this fall as we prepare for the January grand opening.

Our only disagreement with Morris is that we see all our region’s cultural institutions—large or small, established or new, located in downtown Indianapolis, on 38th Street, at Conner Prairie or in the suburbs, as complementary to each other. The ISO’s success is integral to the success of the arts everywhere in our region, creating a ripple effect of growth and appreciation for all of the community’s arts organizations. And the same is true for the success of the Center for the Performing Arts.

Although Morris’s tone does not appear to support regionalism, we at the Center for the Performing Arts wish the ISO all the best in its drive to grow its endowment. We hope to be able to welcome [Morris] to The Palladium when it opens this coming January. We feel confident that he will quickly learn what so many others have discovered before him: Thriving arts institutions reinforce one another, giving strength not just to themselves but to their entire community.

__________
Rollin M. Dick
Chairman, Center for the Performing Arts
Steven B. Libman
Executive director, Center for the Performing Arts

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT