IBJNews

Ball State down to five presidential finalists

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The head of Ball State University's presidential search committee said it plans to interview five finalists seeking to become the school's new leader.

The new president will replace Jo Ann Gora, who plans to retire in June after 10 years leading the 18,000-student university in Muncie.

Those finalists are being invited for personal interviews with the search committee this month, said Wayne Estopinal, a Ball State Board of Trustees member who is chairman of the committee.

The names of the finalists, which are being kept confidential during the search, come from among 22 applicants who were first reviewed by an executive search firm, Estopinal told The Star Press of Muncie.

"There are a couple of our finalists who have private sector experience, but all of them are definitely in academia now," he said. "But we don't have any sitting CEOs and we don't have anyone of the nature of a former political figure."

The committee intends to recommend two or three finalists to the Board of Trustees, which will conduct its own interviews before voting on a selection.

Jerry Baker, who is Ball State's search consultant, was also involved in the search that led to Gora's hiring in 2004.

"It is very interesting that Ball State is now seen as much more than a regional university," Baker said. "This is quite different from when I conducted the search that led to Dr. Gora's appointment 10 years ago. A large number of individuals with whom I spoke mentioned how Ball State is now viewed as a much more serious player in the academic community."

Estopinal, who is president of a Jeffersonville architecture firm, said it is a "very strong" group of candidates.

Ball State's 16-member search committee includes four other trustees and several university administrators and faculty members.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT