IBJNews

Ballard: City must build 'attractive urban environment'

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Mayor Greg Ballard will focus on what’s needed to move Indianapolis to the next level in his fourth-annual State of the City address Thursday.

The theme will include putting “the needs of the next decade ahead of the next day, next year or next election,” according to excerpts released Wednesday.

Ballard, a Republican who faces re-election in November, also will discuss the need to improve the city’s core urban neighborhoods “with better infrastructure, better education and better amenities.”

“Basically, we must build an attractive urban environment,” Ballard’s speech excerpts read.

Part of the speech also is expected to include discussion about a possible redevelopment opportunity near downtown.

He will tout the city’s record at bringing in jobs last year and Indianapolis’ fiscal position, both issues local Democrats will likely dispute.  

The speech will take place at 5:30 p.m. at the Indianapolis Artsgarden downtown.

It was rescheduled from its original date in January because of the fatal shooting of Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department Officer David Moore, who passed away Jan. 26.

Check IBJ.com Thursday evening for coverage of the address.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Let Me Translate
    "Part of the speech also is expected to include discussion about a possible redevelopment opportunity near downtown."

    Ballard is thinking about supporting a public-private partnership project to make a company wealthy at taxpayer expense, certainly a company that has contributed to Mayor Ballard's campaign.

    This act is so old. I can't wait until 1/1/2012 and I don't have to listen to that sell out anymore.

  • No So Field Of Dreams
    Inside the North of South Land Deal - It is not pretty

    http://hadenoughindy.blogspot.com/2011/02/no-so-field-of-dreams-lie-and-they-will.html

  • stadium
    Hey I thought Lucas Oil stadium was going to solve all our problems--you mean that is not the case??!
  • Yeah, right.
    The theme will include putting â??the needs of the next decade ahead of the next day, next year or next election,â??

    Except for the millions and millions and millions of dollars that we are spending on the Super Bowl that may or may not happen.
  • Streets
    Well, he can start by putting the streets back together. The intersection of Washington and Capital is absolute nightmare!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT