Bank of Indiana is suing The Estridge Cos. for allegedly failing to repay a $1 million investment the Indianapolis-based
bank provided to the Carmel-based home builder.
The lawsuit filed Sept. 9 in Marion Superior Court charges that Estridge, along with Indianapolis-based Indiana Securities
LLC, committed securities fraud in connection with an offering the bank says was due to be paid off June 30.
The complaint further accuses Indianapolis-based law firm Krieg DeVault LLP of malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty by
representing Bank of Indiana, as well as both Indiana Securities and Estridge, during the offering and without the knowledge
of the bank.
Bank of Indiana is seeking to recoup its investment, as well as all damages available under the Indiana Securities Act, punitive
damages and attorney fees.
Owner Paul Estridge said in an e-mail Wednesday that he has referred the lawsuit to his legal counsel, who advised him not
to comment.
Estridge, however, went on to say that he expects the disagreement to be resolved in “very short order.”
“The claim is absurd,” he said. “We’re home builders, not securities dealers. As such, we’re
focused, like all home builders in this nation, on strengthening our company and building great neighborhoods in the communities
we live in and love.”
The bank asserts in its suit that, throughout 2009 and into 2010, the financial condition of Estridge was deteriorating,
and the likelihood of a return on its investment was in decline.
In June, IBJ reported that the once-formidable home builder had received a $10 million
investment to help it weather the severe housing downturn.
That infusion was unusual on two fronts. Few companies in the out-of-favor home-building industry are able to raise capital
these days. And the source of the Estridge funds wasn’t a traditional investor—it was subcontractors with a long-standing
relationship with the custom builder.
Then, owner Paul Estridge said the company was in no danger of becoming the latest casualty of the meltdown. Yet he acknowledged
the difficulties of securing traditional bank financing at a time many have restricted lending.
About 25 investors agreed to chip in from $25,000 to $500,000 in exchange for ownership stakes. Collectively, the subcontractors
own 35 percent of the company.
Estridge, the area’s largest custom builder based on homes constructed, expects to build 250 homes this year ranging
in price from $300,000 to more than $1 million.
The launch of its most ambitious project, the proposed Symphony development in Westfield, hinged on the investment from the
subcontractors, Estridge said.
The home builder, though, sought outside funding long before this year, according to Bank of Indiana’s suit.
On Dec. 29, 2006, Estridge filed paperwork with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to raise funds through a private
security offering. Indiana Securities served as the underwriter for the offering, the complaint said.
Less than two weeks later, the bank purchased $1 million worth of three-year subordinated notes paying 11 percent interest.
Later in 2007, however, the bank charges that the defendants added several amendments to the offering without its knowledge.
Chief among them was a change to the due date of the notes, from June 30, 2010, to “a date several years later,”
according to the suit.
“Upon maturity, the Estridge defendants have failed and/or refused to pay the $1 million due and owing to the plaintiffs,
despite repeated demands to do so,” the complaint said.
Bank of Indiana also names in its suit Frank Neese, owner of Indiana Securities, who also served as board chairman of Bank
of Indiana at the time it purchased the notes, and Dawn Barringer, an Indiana Securities partner. Calls to Indiana Securities
were not returned.
Krieg DeVault partner Karen Woods is named, as well.
John C. Trimble, a lawyer at Indianapolis-based Lewis Wagner LLP, is representing Krieg DeVault.
He said in an e-mail that the firm believes the allegations are without merit, and it intends to vigorously defend the case.
Because the matter is in litigation, he declined to further comment.
Bank of Indiana is represented by Mark Waterfill, a partner at the Indianapolis office of Cleveland-based Benesch Friedlander
Coplan & Aronoff LLP.

















IBJ Conversations
39 Comments
Add Comment
or thought of class action suit?
Centennial?
But since you are playing that card, since times are rough and you can't give us promised amenities that we are PAYING for in HOA dues, then I don't think I want to pay the full amount for the house anymore either. I mean, times are rough, you should be supporting the homeowner and your communities and help us out too. Give me back $50k and we'll call it even.
"Wilt thou seal all avenues of ill, pay every debt as tho GOD wrote the bill."
Ralph Waldo Emerson
Wow are you supporting Estridge here? Another clueless Estridge employee posting nonsense on message boards. Blame the banks? Don't try to make them the boogeyman for your company's misdeeds. You are right about one thing - the sometimes make bad investments - Estridge is one of them!
I used to work for one of the firsst builders to go under, and believe me, there is plenty of blame to go around. We had banks and private investors contacting us wanting to get involved in the next project. We had mortgage brokers courting us so that we would bring home buyers to them when units were sold. I personally attended a closing on a seven figure home where the buyer, after putting up $25k earnest money, walked out with a check for $10k. He put $15k down on a seven figure home.
Nobody ever inteded to stiff anybody. But nobody ever stopped to ask, "Do we really need this many houses?"
Now everybody is paying the price. Folks like me have had to move on in their careers, banks are having to deal with huge REO inventories and the related loan losses, and vendors are having to write off receivable from now defunct builders.
It's nobody's fault, but at the same time, it's everybody's fault. How each of us reacts will tell alot about our character.
Securities fraud means they intentionally misrepresented the investment. A serious crime.
This is a false but sensational headline to attract attention. In the internet age, a false accusation like this will live in Google searches forever.
As for the bank, they made a bad loan, live with it. If they want to put him out of business with this suit, go ahead, but I have a feeling they are trying to get blood from a turnip at this point.
Just my opinions, no inside knowledge.