IBJNews

Bill kicks off years of change for local health care players

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The health reform bill passed Sunday night will open the doors to years of changes that are only partially clear today.

The legislation is likely to make a big impact not only on Indiana’s health industry but also on all employers and individuals.

“Everything’s going to change,” said Greg Pemberton, a health care attorney at Ice Miller LLP in Indianapolis. But because provisions of the bill phase in over the next decade, he added, “There’s going to be less of a dramatic change that happens overnight.”

The most immediate impact will fall on health insurers and individuals. When the law takes effect, companies like WellPoint Inc. will no longer be able to deny coverage to those with expensive medical conditions. They will face limitations on how much more they can charge a sick person than a healthy one.

By 2014, individuals will be forced to have insurance and companies will have to offer insurance—or else pay a fine. But insurers worry that the fines are not large enough to force all people to pay, meaning many will wait to buy until they face huge medical bills.

“WellPoint is disappointed that after more than a year of debate, Congress has approved health care legislation that does little to reduce cost and improve quality—two important elements to building a sustainable health care system that provides affordable coverage for all Americans,” wrote Kristin Binns, spokeswoman for the insurer, in an e-mail. The company's stock price, along with the stock of other insurers, fell in morning trading.

Many analysts, and even WellPoint executives, have predicted a wave of consolidation by health insurers in response to reform. The bill will require insurers to spend at least 85 percent of their premium revenue on medical claims. That means lower profit per customer for health insurers. Some will want to merge to achieve economies of scales in order to keep up profit levels that appeal to investors.

“Government is going to be a much stronger, more visible business partner, if you will, than they are today,” said Jim Parker, who was chief of staff to WellPoint CEO Angela Braly until last year. He now runs his own consulting firm, Indianapolis-based Meridian Strategic Advisors.

He added, “The industry will tend to be, ironically enough, more bureaucratic than less so, less innovative than more, and in some ways, less customer-responsive than more so, and more responsive to the regulator.”

The benefit to health insurers will begin in 2014, when lower-income Americans begin to receive taxpayer-funded subsidies to help them purchase health insurance. Congressional number crunchers predict those subsidies will reduce the number of the uninsured by 19 million in 2014 and as much as 32 million in 2019.

Between now and 2014, uninsured people with medical problems could receive coverage in a new high-risk pool created by the legislation.

More people with insurance is good news for just about every sector of the health industry. It should mean fewer unpaid bills at hospitals and more customers available to doctors. It also means more people will be able to afford expensive prescription drugs, such as those made by Indianapolis-based Eli Lilly and Co.

Lilly’s senior vice president of communications, Bart Peterson, applauded passage of the bill in a statement issued Monday morning.

“While not perfect, we believe the legislation sustains and encourages innovation, a key priority for reform that will ensure we can deliver the next generation of treatments and cures for patients,” Peterson said.

The bill creates a pathway for generic versions of biotech drugs to come to the U.S. market for the first time. However, Lilly and its peers successfully lobbied for 12 years of exclusivity on their biotech drugs, a big increase from the five they currently enjoy on chemical pills. Patents can extend those periods of exclusivity even longer.

More insured patients also means fewer unpaid bills at hospitals. That’s good, noted Dan Evans, CEO of Indianapolis-based Clarian Health. But there’s a downside to it as well.

Half of the additional people insured would receive coverage through the federal Medicaid program. In Indiana, the Medicaid program pays rates substantially lower than it costs doctors and hospitals to provide care.

So hospitals and doctors will still lose money on these patients—if they agree to see them at all. And losses will be made up by charging higher rates to patients with private insurance, Evans said.

“The cost shifting will have to continue. Private payers will continue to pay more,” he said. “The proof of that is the number of hospitals and doctors who are [already] closing their doors to Medicaid.”

The expansion of insurance coverage will be paid for with a new Medicare payroll tax on individuals making more than $200,000 a year and families making more than $250,000. Much of the rest of the money will come from $12 billion a year in new fees on the health industry.

Drugmakers will collectively pay $2.7 billion a year. Health insurers will pay $6.7 billion a year. And makers of medical devices will pay $2 billion each year.

Executives from the device industry have said the fees would kill jobs and slow innovation. It falls on them hardest because they often sold their products directly to health care providers, whether or not the end customer had insurance. That means the newly insured customers will have a minimal benefit for device makers.

Les Funtleyder, a health care stock analyst at Miller Tabak & Co. in New York, views the bill as positive overall for health care stocks. The downside of the whole exercise, however, is that it fails to control ever-rising medical costs.

“We would suggest, however, that because there is little apparent direct cost-control in the bill (which among other reasons is why it is positive for the stocks) there will be revisions to policy over the next few years,” he wrote in an e-mail to investors Monday morning. In other words, health reform is far from done.

Clarian's Evans agreed.

"It’s got one-half of the algorithm and not the other half," he said of the bill. "Unless and until individuals are incented to improve their own health, and unless and until health care providers are incented on quality rather than quantity, the fiscal cost of health care reform will be too great."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • For sure
    End for America as it was founded... free
    That ended loooong ago with those nasty freebies like socialist education for all kids, socialist old-folks payments called social security, socialist care like Medicare... which I am sure you wouldn't ever dip into- rolls eyes.
  • Wow
    I would expect those who read IBJ to actually be educated and not express Beck-ian kneejerk reactions of fascism or socialism (two totally different ideologies, by the way). But you've infested this publication, too.

    Health insurers are a parasite, providing nothing of worth to society. The bill that Obama will soon sign takes baby steps to true reform, but until Wellpoint, Aetna, etc. are out of business, citizens will not be truly free.
  • Facism...Obama style
    How do like Hope & Change now...???
  • Agree
    I agree!
  • Down with Obama
    We work hard and pay for college, so that we have better jobs. Then we pay for insurance at those better jobs...and now your telling me that I get to pay for people who did not invest in college to have a better job and who can not afford health coverage. For crying out loud, I now get to pay off my student loans, pay for my insurance and pay for bums insurance. Seems fair. Obama sucks.
    • NOT THAT EASY
      I TOTALLY AGREE.
    • Disturbing
      More bureaucracy is scary in and of itself. It doesn't seem to matter who we vote in, they all have their own agendas, not ours. These companies won't pay more, they will just pass it along to the consumer who is already stretched beyond their means. How does this help the economy?
    • Cowards
      Reform without requiring individuals to manage their health is pure political cowardice. It is just like giving out paychecks without requiring work for the pay. This is insane. Throw out all the bums!
    • No Change In Marion County
      Dave in Indy I wish it was that easy. If oyu could not get the biggest embarassment of Indiana Julia Carson out how can you run out the grandson. Money talks in politics not voters
    • It's all about profit
      Notice that the health insurers' complaints all have to do with looking at reduced profits. Our national system of values mistakenly prioritizes the accumulation of obscene amounts of cash over service to citizens. We are not free if we are being used to make money for someone else. Our so-called "freedoms" are only illusions.
    • Then do something about it
      As I told my wife, if you do not like how the health care bill went down, then vote them out in November. That being said, there are *some* good points in the bill. Vote for true change and maybe the new members will fix the "broken" parts.
    • RIP USA
      Everyone please take a moment of silence for the day that could mark the beginning of the end for the America as it was founded.... free.
      • RIP USA
        Everyone please take a moment of silence for the day that could mark the beginning of the end for the America as it was founded.... free.

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. Again, Maria.... how much are YOU contributing? The man doesn't HAVE to give a red cent! What don't you get about that? And, I know this might actually require some actual "facts", but can you please point me to the parking garage that the city gave to him?

      2. Another internet tuff guy I see. And what would the basis of taking the person to jail? If they were drunk, yea. But if not, there would be no jailable offense. All these gestapo, Nazi, jackboots are running SCARED. When the SHTF in this country who's side are you going to be on? The citzens, or the establishment? Better make up your mind quick because it's not far off. I would rather be trying to make friends than enemies. But no worries my "friend", God will take care of you and your likes in good time. It tells us that in the bible. If you stand, support and help carry out the plans of evil rulers, you will NOT be spared the wrath of God. That simple. All you can do is repent now and ask God to forgive you.

      3. Yes, Ersal, thank you for donating a whole $75,000, while the city gives you a parking garage for free and is going to pay for a multi million dollar stadium for you. I'd be donating money too if I was on welfare.

      4. I live and work in Broad Ripple and agree 100% that the traffic is not a significant problem. It can be slow at some times, but hey...this is an urban area. As for the development itself...HOORAY. Office and retail development brings people during the day, something that our community needs much more of. Thank goodness people are finally waking up to take advantage of the serene White River views. The BRVA land us committee endorsed the project because they know how these kind of projects help offset the cries of "too many bars". Pray that this development, and the proposed major investment by Browning, move forward. And remember Good Earth, these will mean hundreds of daytime people - potential shoppers for your store.

      5. Under current, previous existing law, this new law would be unconstitutional. Not that supposedly having to have a driver's license to drive isn't in the first place.

      ADVERTISEMENT