Bill to ban Indiana teacher union deductions advances

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Republicans sparked protests from teachers and union officials Tuesday by pushing legislation through a House committee that would bar Indiana schools from automatically deducting union dues from teacher paychecks, an issue that critics thought was off the table this year.

The legislation, which has the support of Gov. Mike Pence, cleared the House Education Committee along party lines.

If the plan makes its way through the GOP-controlled Legislature, it would be another major blow to Indiana's unions. A right-to-work law was approved last year that banned collecting mandatory union fees at private businesses, a year after lawmakers restricted the collective bargaining power of teachers.

"This is being done, in my opinion, to do nothing but stifle their representative voice, as other legislation that has been passed in recent history," said Rick Muir, president of the Indiana Federation of Teachers.

Pence, a Republican, and the Indiana Chamber of Commerce logged their support for the measure Tuesday. Chamber President Kevin Brinegar said a school district or other government unit should not be involved in collecting money which can then be used for political purposes.

Rep. Jeff Thompson, a retired high school chemistry teacher who said he paid union dues by check, slipped the proposal in shortly before a key legislative deadline Tuesday in the House. The Republican from Lizton said deducting union dues from paychecks is equivalent to lawmakers raising political donations using their Statehouse phones.

"Even though it costs the state nothing, it's wrong for me to collect contributions using the Statehouse property," Thompson said. "It's just not the way it should be done, is it?"

But it's unclear how the legislation would fare in the Senate. The chairman of that chamber's education committee, Sen. Dennis Kruse, said he had decided not to consider a similar Senate bill on teacher union dues and wasn't sure whether he would act on the House measure.

"I think we've the teachers pretty hard the last couple of years, and I don't think we need to keep doing things that from their perspective would hurt them," said Kruse, a Republican from Auburn. "I think we should just pause for a little while and let some of these changes we've made be implemented and let things go on for a little bit."

The support marks something of a surprise from Pence, who did not mention the issue during his campaign and left it out of his policy "roadmap." A top policy adviser, however, told the committee that the governor favored the measure.

"Governor Pence supports this bill because it rewards high-performing schools and teachers with more freedom and flexibility, and he does not believe public schools should collect money for private entities," Pence spokeswoman Christy Denault said after the committee vote.

The measure now heads to the full House.


  • Thanks MarcusR
    Actually you're wrong Marcus, the GOP hates people smarter then they are.
  • Common Sense Change
    The difference between the govt. collecting a donation to United Way and collecting a union due is that the employee willingly directed the United Way contribution. Many employees have surendered payment of union dues as an involuntary deduction as a condition to employment. Making mandatory patronage to any political, religious or private institution as a condition of gainful employement is unconscienable. A governmental organization's participation in making such collection is tantamount to forced recognition of a religion or political party, and a violation of freedom of expression. How the Government got into the collection business to begin with was unconstitutional or misguided. This is a good start in the reformation of our educational institutions and the quality of instruction.
  • Please Educate Me
    So if I want to join a club, trade, or service group, I write a check for the dues directly to the org I want to join, and I get my membership card. In return I get to enjoy the benefits of being a member of that group, and I know my money goes toward a cause I support. How is asking union members to simply send their dues directly to the group they support any different? Why should the government act as the collections arm of any private entity? And how does this make the GOP hate teachers? I'm open to be convinced of the other side of this position, but I have not yet heard a compelling, logical position as to why the government should collect a private entities' monies on behalf of that entity? (And I mean any entity). Should the govt collect tithes on behalf of the church? HINT: 'The GOP hates teachers' falls *just a bit* short of a response that requires the ability to articulate a cogent thought.
  • .
    GOP may hates Unions... Unions are not the same as teachers.
  • What did we expect?
    This is just more of the same from the Party of Stupid. Thanks to the poster who brought up the United Way. If this bill becomes law, I hope that no funds for any private entities are collected including United Way. That's the only way I might believe this wasn't yet another measure to screw the unions. And why is the Chamber of Commerce butting in on this? This organization has just become an extension of the Republican Party.
  • Stop the anti-teacher crusade
    I'm a state employee, and my contribution to United Way is taken from my state-issued paycheck. How is that any different than union dues? These schmucks are going to drive good teachers out of the profession and steer any sensible people away from becoming teachers. Then we'll see how well Indiana's workforce stacks up against national and international competition.
  • Heaven help us from the Indiana GOP.
    They are determined to keep us in the past and maybe it is not in the dark ages, but, they are keeping Indiana from moving forward in the world and acomplishing something worthwhile. Seriously, it is making Indiana a laughing stock in the country...those bacwards Hoosiers. To call someone a Hoosier is to mock them.
  • GOP
    Republicans hate teachers. It's as simple as that.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Aaron is my fav!

    2. Let's see... $25M construction cost, they get $7.5M back from federal taxpayers, they're exempt from business property tax and use tax so that's about $2.5M PER YEAR they don't have to pay, permitting fees are cut in half for such projects, IPL will give them $4K under an incentive program, and under IPL's VFIT they'll be selling the power to IPL at 20 cents / kwh, nearly triple what a gas plant gets, about $6M / year for the 150-acre combined farms, and all of which is passed on to IPL customers. No jobs will be created either other than an handful of installers for a few weeks. Now here's the fun part...the panels (from CHINA) only cost about $5M on Alibaba, so where's the rest of the $25M going? Are they marking up the price to drive up the federal rebate? Indy Airport Solar Partners II LLC is owned by local firms Johnson-Melloh Solutions and Telemon Corp. They'll gross $6M / year in triple-rate power revenue, get another $12M next year from taxpayers for this new farm, on top of the $12M they got from taxpayers this year for the first farm, and have only laid out about $10-12M in materials plus installation labor for both farms combined, and $500K / year in annual land lease for both farms (est.). Over 15 years, that's over $70M net profit on a $12M investment, all from our wallets. What a boondoggle. It's time to wise up and give Thorium Energy your serious consideration. See http://energyfromthorium.com to learn more.

    3. Markus, I don't think a $2 Billion dollar surplus qualifies as saying we are out of money. Privatization does work. The government should only do what private industry can't or won't. What is proven is that any time the government tries to do something it costs more, comes in late and usually is lower quality.

    4. Some of the licenses that were added during Daniels' administration, such as requiring waiter/waitresses to be licensed to serve alcohol, are simply a way to generate revenue. At $35/server every 3 years, the state is generating millions of dollars on the backs of people who really need/want to work.

    5. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...