IBJNews

Bill to change school-grades system moves forward

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana's A-F grading system for individual schools would be scrapped and implementation suspended on a national set of reading and math education standards under a bill the state Senate approved Wednesday.

Another proposal to no longer require local school superintendents to hold a state superintendent's or teacher's license also cleared the Senate after Republican Lt. Gov. Sue Ellspermann cast her first tie-breaking vote as the Senate president.

The 37-13 vote in the Republican-controlled Senate endorsed ending the current system under which the state Department of Education issues a single A-F grade for each school. The Senate bill would have the agency issue two grades for each school: one based on the average academic performance of students, and the other based on how much students have improved.

"Most people think the current system is very complicated, very, very difficult to understand and know how you get these scores," Senate education committee Chairman Dennis Kruse, R-Auburn, said. "This is an effort to make that simple and easy to understand. I think it does that."

The A-F scale was implemented in 2011 and backed by Republican state schools Superintendent Tony Bennett — whom Democrat Glenda Ritz defeated in the November election — despite widespread opposition from teachers and other groups, including the Indiana Chamber of Commerce.

Many educators have complained that the system resulted in some schools with consistently high student test scores receiving low grades because students hadn't shown enough improvement.

The bill approved by the Senate would also suspend implementation of Common Core State Standards until after the state Board of Education receives a report on those standards from a legislative study committee.

House Education Committee Chairman Robert Behning, R-Indianapolis, said he opposes any delays in schools adopting the benchmarks on what students should learn during each grade — benchmarks that have been adopted by 45 states.

Supporters of the new review say they don't believe the standards, developed by a group of state school officials from across the country, had enough public review in Indiana. They argue that the national initiative has led to a loss of local involvement over school standards.

Ritz, the new state schools superintendent, said Wednesday she also didn't want to delay implementation of the standards, but she also supports additional reviews on whether the changes should be made.

The Senate-approved bill seems to split the difference between Ritz and Behning on the A-F school grading scale.

Behning said a dual-grade system would be leave parents and others confused about what they mean, while Ritz wants to get rid of the letter grades completely in favor of putting out numerical data on student achievement and improvement.

"Reporting direct informational data tells way more about the story in their schools," Ritz said.

The tie-breaking vote cast by the lieutenant governor endorsed a bill changing the state's current requirement that school district superintendents have a teaching license and complete graduate school work in education administration.

Supporters say the change would give local school boards more flexibility to hire a business executive or someone else they believe best fills their needs for a top administrator. Opponents worry that the state would open the door to possible cronyism and lowering standards by allowing superintendents without any classroom experience.

The Senate added a requirement that a district superintendent must have a master's degree, which wasn't in the previous House-approved version of the bill.

Ellspermann's vote after senators split 25-25 was the first tie-breaking vote cast by a lieutenant governor in the chamber since 2005, according to a Senate spokeswoman.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Kent's done a good job of putting together some good guests, intelligence and irreverence without the inane chatter of the other two shows. JMV is unlistenable, mostly because he doesn't do his homework and depends on non-sports stuff to keep HIM interested. Query and Shultz is a bit better, but lack of prep in their show certainly is evident. Sterling obviously workes harder than the other shows. We shall see if there is any way for a third signal with very little successful recent history to make it. I always say you have to give a show two years to grow into what it will become...

  2. Lafayette Square, Washington Square should be turned into office parks with office buildings, conversion, no access to the public at all. They should not be shopping malls and should be under tight security and used for professional offices instead of havens for crime. Their only useage is to do this or tear them down and replace them with high rise office parks with secured parking lots so that the crime in the areas is not allowed in. These are prime properties, but must be reused for other uses, professional office conversions with no loitering and no shopping makes sense, otherwise they have become hangouts long ago for gangs, groups of people who have no intent of spending money, and are only there for trouble and possibly crime, shoplifting, etc. I worked summers at SuperX Drugs in Lafayette Square in the 1970s and even then the shrinkage from shoplifting was 10-15 percent. No sense having shopping malls in these areas, they earn no revenue, attract crime, and are a blight on the city. All malls that are not of use should be repurposed or torn down by the city, condemned. One possibility would be to repourpose them as inside college campuses or as community centers, but then again, if the community is high crime, why bother.

  3. Straight No Chaser

  4. Seems the biggest use of TIF is for pet projects that improve Quality Of Life, allegedly, but they ignore other QOL issues that are of a more important and urgent nature. Keep it transparent and try not to get in ready, fire, Aim! mode. You do realize that business the Mayor said might be interested is probably going to want TIF too?

  5. Gary, I'm in complete agreement. The private entity should be required to pay IPL, and, if City parking meters are involved, the parking meter company. I was just pointing out how the poorly-structured parking meter deal affected the car share deal.

ADVERTISEMENT