Bill would bolster Hoosier homegrown products

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Restaurateurs and farmers are calling for Hoosiers to “shake the hand of the hand that feeds them” by helping them promote their products.

House Bill 1039 – approved unanimously Thursday by the Agriculture and Rural Development committee – is meant to bolster a program that brands Indiana-grown produce and meat.

The initiative, called Indiana Grown, was developed in 2012 and assigned to the economic development team at the Indiana State Department of Agriculture. The program has fewer than 20 applicants so far, but House Bill 1039 is designed to take the idea and help it grow into a possible billion-dollar market.

Hoosiers spent roughly $14.5 billion a year on food and 90 percent of that money goes to sources out of state, the bill’s supporters said. They said that creates a window of opportunity.

Farmer and restaurateur Pete Eshelman said the bill would allow Indiana’s economy to grow and give the state a new reputation.

“If we keep these dollars in the state — 10, 15, 20 percent — we become a state that feeds ourselves,” Eshelman said. “What an opportunity to become the state that feeds itself and creates this economy.”

The bill also creates a fund that would provide seed money to get the program on its feet. It also provides money for marketing, promotions and tourism for Indiana-grown agriculture. The bill’s author, Rep. Matthew Lehman, R-Berne, recommended that the funds be pulled from tobacco revenue. But those funds are committed elsewhere and Lehman suggested applying for grants for the program.

Jill Pritchard from the agriculture department, said food purchased locally is better.

“It isn’t unusual for food to travel 1,500 miles before hitting the plate,” Pritchard said. “It results in a loss in quality, nutritional value and taste.”

A number of states – including Kentucky, Ohio, Virginia and South Carolina – have active home-grown initiatives. Studies on the South Carolina program found that there was a $5 to $6 return per dollar invested in the system, supporters said.

South Carolina officials have also created an app that shows users which restaurants use at least 30 percent local ingredients in their menu.

Lehman said Indiana can take similar steps to help push the initiative forward.

“We can do print ads, we can do high school basketball tournaments, we can do promotions and apps on iPhones and we can have T-shirts,” Lehman said. “There’s an excitement out there I think to really begin to promote this Indiana Grown. I think it all comes down to marketing.”

All the testimony Thursday was in favor of the bill.

“I think what we’re really talking about here is building a one-, two-, three-billion dollar new culinary economy in this state,” Eshelman said. “That opportunity is there.”

The bill passed 12-0 and will move to the full House for consideration.


  • about time
    Farming is difficult and any boost to preserve the local farmer's livelihood is beneficial to consumers. The foods are much fresher and more nutritious . In the long run, they should be cheaper, too.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now