Bill would crack down on sales to secondhand shops

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana lawmakers are considering a bill that would crack down on sales of stolen goods to secondhand stores.

The Senate bill would require those who purchase secondhand goods for resale to log their purchases, photograph the sellers and items, and keep purchased items off the shelves for five days.

Indiana already has similar requirements in place for pawn shops.

While pawn shops and secondhand stores "are two different kinds of places, they create the same market for stolen property," Republican state Sen. Jim Banks of Columbia City told the Journal & Courier.

Banks wrote the bill after hearing from a Columbia City business owner who said items stolen from his property ended up at a secondhand store nearby.

The bill Banks is sponsoring would carry fines of up to $1,000 to shop owners who failed to follow the proposed rules.

Lafayette Police Department crime analyst Steve Hawthorne told the Journal & Courier that he doubts the bill will do much to deter thieves.

"This bill might tighten up loopholes and deter criminals a little bit," Hawthorne said. "But I think no matter what, they will find a way to get rid of the stolen material. If they can't get cash for it, they can barter it for drugs."

Ben Brinn, a Lafayette resident who owns secondhand clothing stores, said he's worried about the effect the bill might have on his businesses.

"We handle hundreds, sometimes thousands of items per week," Brinn told the Journal & Courier. "Having to photograph every item and seller, plus not sell the item for five days, that would just be way, way too burdensome to handle."

Brinn's stores already require clothing sellers to show photo ID and sign a form declaring they own the item they are selling. He said he hopes the Senate will include an exception in the bill for stores like his that sell high-volume, low-value items.

The bill has been assigned to the Committee on Commerce and Economic Development and Technology.


  • Waste of Time
    Big Government Move. That is what we need, another state department that monitors small business owners. I wonder if the State Legislature is going to demand similar accountability at Gun Shows?
  • Bad idea
    I sell used books & am lucky to make a razor thin profit. Most folks like me with booths in antique malls are small fry and honorable. Consumers have an obligation to record serial numbers on their valuables or to photograph their belongings for insurance purposes. This law seems unenforceable and it burdens the many for the dishonesty of the few and the irresponsibility of the many who don't keep records of or photograph their belongs. Advice to legislators: watch de Sica's "The Bicycle Thief." It's damn hard to police small crimes.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing