IBJNews

Blood drawn from cop after crash OK for trial

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The Indiana Supreme Court on Monday let stand a ruling saying blood was drawn properly from an allegedly intoxicated Indianapolis police officer after a 2010 fatal crash. But the officer's attorney said it's uncertain whether the evidence can be introduced at trial.

The high court on Monday agreed with an Indiana Court of Appeals ruling allowing evidence that showed Officer David Bisard had a blood-alcohol level of 0.19 percent — more than twice the legal limit — when his cruiser plowed into two motorcycles stopped at a traffic light, killing Eric Well and critically injuring two other people in 2010.

Marion County Prosecutor Terry Curry says that means the sample can be used to support drunken driving and criminal recklessness charges against Bisard.

However, Bisard's attorney, John Kautzman, said he can still challenge admission of the blood at trial regarding its chain of custody and says the sample's credibility before a jury also remains in doubt.

"There's challenges that can occur at the trial stage," Kautzman said. Bisard faces charges of operating a vehicle while intoxicated, reckless homicide and criminal recklessness.

The Court of Appeals ruled in September that a Marion County judge erred in determining the blood drawn from Bisard after the Aug. 6, 2010, crash was inadmissible because it was drawn by a medical assistant, a profession not included among those listed in Indiana law that are allowed to draw blood in drunken driving cases.

Former Marion County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi stunned the victims and public when he dropped drunken driving charges against Bisard just days after they were filed, which he did because of the discrepancy. After taking office last year, Curry refiled the charges against Bisard.

Marion County Judge Grant Hawkins subsequently ruled the blood couldn't be used as evidence of drunken driving but could be used to support a reckless homicide charge. The appeals court then ruled legislators clearly hadn't intended for key evidence to be thrown out on a technicality.

Curry said Monday he hopes the Bisard case goes to trial next year, but a trial date has not been set. Hawkins last week agreed to move the trial out of the Indianapolis media market because of the case's extensive publicity, but the new venue might not be known until the next hearing in February.

Hawkins has allowed prosecutors to test a second blood sample despite objections by Kautzman that it was mishandled by police technicians. The results of those tests haven't been released.

The city of Indianapolis has agreed to pay settlements totaling $3.85 million to Wells' family and the other two motorcyclists hurt in the crash.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Lets hope this sticks
    Cops should be glad to see justice done. How many of them are weighing in on this? Hopefully our champions of justice at the FOP will put there full support behind the vigorous prosecution of this case.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In my opinion the estridge companies are crooks. They filed bankruptcy on their 'track housing' side of the business two weeks before they closed on one of my clients' homes. When my client first interviewed Estridge as a builder 6 months before, they specifically ASKED about the solvency of their business, knowing that some builders were struggling. Estridge truly misrepresented their financial situation at that time. I suppose I am more unhappy with the whole system than I am with the builder because what the heck==you can file bankruptcy on 'track homes' but still keep building and make money off of 'custom built' homes??? How ridiculous! They are all homes. How can a company be allowed to bilk thousands of dollars from their subcontractors but still be allowed to build houses?? they should have been made to pay back all their unpaid contractors before being allowed to profit from building any more houses! This alone makes them and the system crooks in my eyes. I would never build an estridge home and I would not recommend for my clients either. If they were truly 'bankrupt' how could they afford to keep building homes anyway??? The whole system needs fixed.

  2. I live a couple blocks east of the Angie's campus and my house is assessed for ~$160,000. If I could get that amount, let alone $384,000 (a 140% bonus), I'd sell in a minute. Either Angie's stockholders just got fleeced, or Angie's is getting about a 58% discount on their property taxes, if these properties are actually worth what they paid Mr. Oesterle for them. Which do you think is the case?

  3. Perhaps the IMA board is really to blame! They agreed to hire Charles. They can't seemingly find donors among themselves, or bring in new blood that will support the museums operating budget with an expanded museum and money to provide curators with something to do (ie buy art). The headlines of disarray at the museum and mass firings are hurting the reputation of the museum for some time to come. If people on the board had misgivings, perhaps they shpuld have more forcefully opposed efforts that they have seemingly been unable to fund, like expansion and the costs it has created!

  4. See, I told u Indyman and Dipsicle....this 8 days is overkill. It's barely worth a weekend....great job Tony George! Your dream has been fulfilled....he fans want the I r l back. Thats how good it was.....and that sucked.

  5. I have been in training for a short time now but right off I can see that safety and quality are the number one issues, my experience as of late has been a positive one, the employees along with Jeff the plant manager and the operation supervisor as well as the engineers are a highly motivated group of people, what an asset for the area to have and for company's in need of a quality metal products.

ADVERTISEMENT