IBJNews

BlueLock plans $35.6 million investment, 118 new jobs

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indianapolis-based tech firm BlueLock LLC is poised to continue its growth spurt, planning a $35.6 million investment at its north-side facility that could create 118 jobs.

City planners have recommended approval of a 10-year tax abatement for BlueLock tied to the project. The city’s Metropolitan Development Commission is scheduled to consider a preliminary abatement Wednesday.

If approved, the tax abatement would save the company an estimated $1.7 million over the 10-year span.

BlueLock announced in January that it nearly tripled its work force last year, growing to 22 employees from eight in 2008.

Documents filed with the MDC indicate it now has 27 workers who make an average of $33.65 an hour. The new positions will pay the same amount.

Founded in 2006, BlueLock provides infrastructure as a service to businesses as an alternative to investing in computer hardware. IBJ Media is among its 70 clients.

The company plans to expand its facility at 6325 Morenci Trail and purchase Web servers and other equipment necessary to expands its so-called cloud computing network.

BlueLock is among several companies owned by Collina Ventures, an investment firm created by local tech entrepreneurs Mark and Karen Hill that also holds local tech firm Cantaloupe and Indianapolis-based Achievant.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Another Gimme for Business
    We're in about our 35th year or so of subsidizing (formally) business deals like this. I believe studies have generally concluded they don't make or break start-ups or expansions; it's just that everyone else is doing it and the politicians practically force these tax break offers on them because they're afraid they'll go someplace else. Time to quit that, I say, and make them pay property taxes the way the rest of us do.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT