Borders liquidation another blow to retail real estate

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Borders Group Inc.’s proposed liquidation will increase available U.S. retail space by about 6.3 million square feet as the industry struggles with near-record vacancy rates and stagnant rents.

DJM Realty LLC plans to auction 259 Borders leases in two separate sales, likely in August and September, said Andy Graiser, co-president of the Melville, N.Y.-based property- consulting firm. That’s on top of about 225 stores the book retailer began closing after its February bankruptcy.

Ann Arbor, Mich.-based Borders closed three central Indiana locations as part of the reorganization following its Feb. 16 filing. Last month, the company identified another 51 stores it could be forced to liquidate to meet terms of an agreement with its lenders, including the Indianapolis airport location. It also has locations in Castleton, Greenwood and Noblesville.

About 859 million square feet of U.S. store space is empty, according to CoStar Group Inc. Retailers have cut back amid online competition and a national unemployment rate of more than 9 percent. Borders’ liquidation is the latest to add vacancies after more than a dozen national retailers sought bankruptcy protection since the recession in 2008 and 2009.

“It’s another negative factor when we have an abundance of negative factors in the market,” Ryan Severino, a senior economist at real estate research firm Reis Inc., said. “It’s adding to the headwinds that retail’s facing right now.”

Borders, which has 399 stores, hasn’t hired a firm to handle the disposition of the rest of its locations, which are smaller outlets averaging 1,300 square feet, said Mary Davis, a spokeswoman for the chain.

The bookseller’s stores are in shopping centers, malls and stand-alone locations. The vacancy rate at U.S. neighborhood and community shopping centers rose to 11 percent in the three months ended June 30, near the record of 11.1 percent set in 1990 and up from 10.9 percent, where it had stood since the second quarter of last year, New York-based Reis said July 8.

Shopping center owners’ asking rents in the second quarter fell to $19.03 a square foot from $19.07 a year earlier, the firm said. Effective rents dropped to an average $16.54 from $16.58. Regional mall vacancies rose to 9.3 percent, the highest since Reis began collecting that data in 2000.

Borders, which once had more than 1,000 locations, lost business as customers switched to e-readers such as Amazon.com Inc.’s Kindle, introduced in 2007. It failed to reach agreement with a bidder, Najafi Cos., on a plan to keep the chain running, and will start winding down its stores on July 22.

Liquidators Gordon Brothers Retail Partners LLC and Hilco Merchant Resources LLC will buy the chain’s assets and sell them, subject to bankruptcy-court approval. DJM, a unit of Gordon Brothers Retail parent Gordon Brothers Group LLC, was hired to dispose of 259 Borders leases, the company said in a July 18 statement.

“Even though it’s a huge number of spaces being dumped on the market in bulk, given the quality of the locations I think they’ll lease up quite well,” John Bemis, director of leasing at Chicago-based commercial real estate brokerage Jones Lang LaSalle Inc., said.

Dick’s Sporting Goods Inc., Best Buy Co. and Books-A- Million Inc. may be among the retailers interested in Borders sites, Bemis said.

Paula Baldwin, a spokeswoman for Best Buy, said the company doesn’t comment on its real estate plans. Anne-Marie Megela, director of investor relations for Dick’s, and Terrance Finley, executive vice president at Books-A-Million, didn’t return telephone calls seeking comment.

The Borders stores whose leases will be auctioned range in size from 10,000 square feet to 40,218 square feet, DJM said. The average size is about 25,000 square feet, according to Christopher Macke, senior real estate strategist for CoStar, a Washington, D.C.-based property data company.

Macke estimates that vacancies at retail centers with a Borders location may rise to 18.8 percent should all the stores be shuttered. Before closures, the rate was about 4.2 percent.

Retailers that are growing may find the Borders locations attractive because they will be able to open new stores in four months to a year, said Graiser of DJM. The closures also will allow some landlords to redevelop their properties, he said.

Shopping-center landlords may lose desirable customers because Borders shoppers tend to be affluent, Macke said. Property owners also may have difficulty filling some stores if they plan to subdivide them because the spaces are “fairly narrow and deep,” Macke said.

Indianapolis-based Simon Property Group Inc., the largest U.S. mall owner, and General Growth Properties Inc., the second biggest, each have 23 Borders stores, according to data from Green Street Advisors Inc. of Newport Beach, Calif. Simon, based in Indianapolis, owns or has stakes in 263 million square feet in North America, Europe and Asia. Chicago-based General Growth’s portfolio totals almost 170 million square feet.


  • Competition
    I have noticed the past couple years that Borders stores weren't what they used to be (dimished stock, fewer employees).
    As far as TGI Fridays--now that there is competition for decent food in the airport, they lost out as their quality did not stack up. Last time I ate there the food was so oversalted it was barely edible.
  • hmmm
    Hows that hopey changey thing working out for everybody
    • Good deals available?
      Any word on how quickly the local stores will be discounting and selling off store fictures, etc.?
    • Airport
      The airport loses another store, TGI Friday's first, possibly Sterling Silver and now Border's. Not good!

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. So as I read this the one question that continues to come to me to ask is. Didn't Indiana only have a couple of exchanges for people to opt into which were very high because we really didn't want to expect the plan. So was this study done during that time and if so then I can understand these numbers. I also understand that we have now opened up for more options for hoosiers to choose from. Please correct if I'm wrong and if I'm not why was this not part of the story so that true overview could be taken away and not just parts of it to continue this negative tone against the ACA. I look forward to the clarity.

    2. It's really very simple. All forms of transportation are subsidized. All of them. Your tax money already goes toward every single form of transportation in the state. It is not a bad thing to put tax money toward mass transit. The state spends over 1,000,000,000 (yes billion) on roadway expansions and maintenance every single year. If you want to cry foul over anything cry foul over the overbuilding of highways which only serve people who can afford their own automobile.

    3. So instead of subsidizing a project with a market-driven scope, you suggest we subsidize a project that is way out of line with anything that can be economically sustainable just so we can have a better-looking skyline?

    4. Downtowner, if Cummins isn't getting expedited permitting and tax breaks to "do what they do", then I'd be happy with letting the market decide. But that isn't the case, is it?

    5. Patty, this commuter line provides a way for workers (willing to work lower wages) to get from Marion county to Hamilton county. These people are running your restaurants, hotels, hospitals, and retail stores. I don't see a lot of residents of Carmel working these jobs.