IBJNews

Boycott reaches 30 days for Indiana House Democrats

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A legislative stalemate in Indiana reached a political milestone on Tuesday as House Democrats who fled the state to block legislation they oppose stayed away for a 30th consecutive day in what now ranks among the longest Statehouse boycotts in recent U.S. history.

Several ingredients contributed to the ongoing standoff, including a supercharged political atmosphere, major proposed changes on fundamental issues, and the state Constitution itself, which requires a quorum for any laws to be passed.

Indiana House Democrats, outnumbered by Republicans 60-40, walked off their jobs and fled to Illinois last month to derail bills they consider an attack on labor unions and public education. Democrats say it's a day-to-day decision on when they'll return — though they won't be back Wednesday.

Republicans said they're hopeful that House Democrats will return soon, but are moving on without them with informal hearings in the House and official work in the Senate. House Speaker Brian Bosma, R-Indianapolis, suggested the 30th day of the walkout was no cause for celebration.

"It's been a negative historic milestone, but we're working through it," Bosma told reporters Tuesday after again trying unsuccessfully to convene the House.

Those backing the boycott are glad Democrats remain in Urbana, Ill. Jeff Combs, with the Teamsters Local Union No. 135 in Indianapolis, said he's been at the Statehouse every day since the walkout began.

"We're getting tired, but we're not going away," he said as union members chanted slogans and held signs inside the Statehouse Tuesday. "Nobody ever wants it to have to come to this, but they (Republicans) didn't want to negotiate. Both sides are not going to come out of this a winner. There's got to be some give or take."

Indiana's founding fathers likely wanted a spirit of compromise when they included in the state Constitution a requirement that two-thirds of members be present for the House to conduct business, said Gregory Koger, a University of Miami assistant professor of political science who has studied walkouts and filibusters.

"Maybe they want to create the potential for obstruction so there is some degree of consensus on what gets done," Koger said. "That's not necessarily a bad thing."

Most states only require a simple majority of lawmakers to be present to conduct business, which means boycotts wouldn't stop proceedings unless some members of the majority joined them. Brenda Erickson, a senior research analyst at the National Conference of State Legislatures, said only four state constitutions require "supermajority quorums" to conduct any business: Indiana, Tennessee, Oregon and Texas, where a 2003 boycott halted business for the entire 30-day span of a special legislative session.

Vermont's House requires a supermajority quorum to approve state tax increases, Erickson said, and Wisconsin requires one for measures that spend money. That rule allowed Wisconsin Republicans to get around a recent Democratic boycott by removing the spending portions of a bill Democrats opposed and then passing it with a simple majority.

Koger predicts more walkouts as politics continue to grow more polarizing.

"If one party has an agenda that the other considers way out there, neither party can compromise with the other and maintain credibility with their own loyalists," Koger said. "Then it's really hard to get anything done."

Indiana Republicans saw big legislative gains in 2010 elections — thanks in part to more conservative tea party voters — and are pursuing an aggressive plan this year with the GOP in control of the House, Senate, governor's office and every statewide elected position. Most Democrats who survived November are in legislative districts considered safe and have little to lose politically if most of their constituents support the boycott.

Republicans argue that elections should have consequences, and say they refused to "be bullied" into dropping items from their agenda. Democrats insist that Republicans are overreaching.

"Really part of what we're trying to do in a historical sense is steer things back to the middle," said Rep. Scott Pelath, D-Michigan City.

The impasse was first sparked by a so-called "right-to-work" bill that Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels had warned could derail other proposals, but that bill is now dead. The National Right to Work Committee and its Indiana affiliate announced Tuesday a newspaper ad campaign urging Daniels and Republicans to revive the issue. Democrats said they trust Republicans who have assured them the issue will not be resurrected, but said the campaign reflects mounting pressure from the right.

Democrats also oppose a handful of other issues, including restrictions on collective bargaining and a voucher proposal that would direct taxpayer money to private schools. Democrats say labor and education issues are at the heart of their constituencies, making it easier for them to stay united as they boycott.

"Members of the House Democratic Caucus remain resolved in our commitment to fight the radical agenda aimed at Indiana's middle class," House Minority Leader Patrick Bauer said in a statement Tuesday.

But the complicated mix of issues does make it more complicated to find solutions. Previous walkouts in Indiana, including some revolving around a single issue, have been resolved with negotiations and compromise. Legislative boycotts can also end when one party decides they've made their point and return without much to show for it, Koger said.

In extreme cases — such as a 1924 boycott in Rhode Island that led to fisticuffs on the Senate floor and a gas bomb intended to drive the presiding officer from his podium — Koger said long-term standoffs can end a more drastic way: with a new round of elections.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • hijacked our vote???? What campaign platform did you see?
    I don�t see how anyone can claim their votes were hijacked. The Republicans had no campaign platform stating that in a time of economical downturn they would reduce the corporate income tax by 40%, claim that teacher unions were evil, and want tax money for select private schools that don�t have to follow the rules our state puts on public schools. At least I didn�t vote for this?

    But consider the next move�.remove police unions so politicians can hire and fire, promote, demote, and continue to run above the law. Clearly, if teacher unions are bad, police and fire unions would be even more evil. All government employees should be like those in CPS, license branches, and those we see in state government. They know what is best for you!!!!!
  • Media Coverage
    I wish the media would just ignore Bauer and the Democrats in Illinois. If there were absolutely no press coverage of them, do you think they might come back to Indiana?
  • Where is Jesse Jackson when we need him?
    VOTER DISENFRANCHISEMENT..."is the revocation of the right of suffrage (the right to vote) of a person or group of people, or rendering a person's vote less effective, or ineffective."

    We need Jesse and Al Sharpton and their little megaphones out leading a protest for us.....

    Seriously, the Dems have hijacked our vote using typical union(mob) shakedown moves:


    [sound of knuckles cracking]
    "Hey..dats a nice little pooolitical process ya have there. It would be a shame if somethin' unfortunate were to happen. What say you pay me and friends here to provide a little protection.?"
  • Payment
    I hope the democrats aren't getting paid for this little vacation. This is childish.
  • immoral unions
    Unions are wrong simply because they violate what Jesus says in Matthew 20:15, "Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own?" Minimum wages and unions violate the Scriptures. Forceful bargaining rights of an employee are wrong. A business owner, since it is their money, should have a total say in who he gives his money to and how much, irregardless of how the employee feels. The real problem is the big corporations. It used to be in America most people owned their own businesses. With the paper money scam, corporations became encouraged by tax breaks, special rates on health insurance, and other unfair advantages. This destroyed small businesses who are unable to compete with the tax breaks of large corporations. We need to return to common law (constitutional law), and to do that we need to return to gold and silver as the constitution requires. Gold and silver will force common law on the courts over a period of time, and this will eliminate the big corporations and their favored status by big government handout (welfare) tax breaks and advantages.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT