Braly, Obama spar again over WellPoint cancellation policies

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Angela Braly keeps sparring with President Obama’s administration—this time with the president himself.

The CEO of Indianapolis-based WellPoint Inc. dashed off a letter on Sunday trying to rebut Obama’s weekend criticism of the health insurer for reports that it seeks out breast cancer patients to cancel their policies.

Such claims were reported last month by the news service Reuters, but WellPoint called the story “inaccurate and grossly misleading.”

In her letter, Braly reported that WellPoint paid for breast cancer coverage for 200,000 women last year and canceled the policies of just four. None of the cancellations were because the women had breast cancer, Braly said, suggesting instead that the women had misrepresented their health status.

The Obama administration first chided WellPoint immediately after the Reuters story appeared on April 22. Kathleen Sebelius, secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, wrote a letter to Braly, calling WellPoint’s alleged practice “deplorable” and “unconscionable” and asking for WellPoint to stop the practice immediately.

Then on Saturday, during his weekly radio address, Obama noted how Sebelius’ letter got results—even though he didn’t name WellPoint specifically.

“When we found that an insurance company was systematically dropping the coverage of women diagnosed with breast cancer, my administration called on them to put an end to this practice immediately,” Obama said. “Two weeks ago, the entire insurance industry announced that it would comply with the new law early, and stop the perverse practice of dropping people’s coverage when they get sick.”

WellPoint did change its rescission policy two weeks ago to match the new health law signed by Obama in March. The new law says health insurers can cancel a customer’s policy only in cases of fraud or intentional lying. Previously, health insurers would sometimes cancel a customer’s policy even if he or she omitted or misconstrued information, even unwittingly.

Braly chided Obama for continuing to attack health insurers—as he did effectively in working to get the law passed—at a time when implementing the new law requires greater collaboration.

“If we are going to make this law work on behalf of all Americans,” Braly wrote, “the attacks on the health insurance industry—a valued industry that provides coverage for more than 200 million Americans—must end.”


  • Wellpoint Cancellations
    Let's repost the quote:

    ââ?¬Å?If we are going to make this law work on behalf of all Americans,ââ?¬Â? Braly wrote, ââ?¬Å?the attacks on the health insurance industryââ?¬â??a valued industry that provides coverage for more than 200 million Americansââ?¬â??must end.ââ?¬Â?

    CEOS of companies like Wellpoint, making the salaries that they do with the perks that they get and then firing people and then giving them MILLIONS OF DOLLARS in severence to go away is WHAT MUST END.

    HOW ABOUT THIS IDEA, LET'S DO AWAY WITH INSURANCE COMPANIES ALL TOGETHER AND SEE HOW QUICKLY THE HOSPITALS AND PROVIDERS GET USED TO MAKING LESS MONEY. Let's see how quickly healthcare costs come down. Isn't it a fact that our providers charge more so that they can get what insurance companies deem as reasonable and customary. What about our 20% we have to pay and what about all those poor souls who are private pays. I shutter at the thought.

    The increase rate excuses that is being put out to upgrade systems to meet the rules and regulations of the new Obama healthcare plan is yet another excuse so that these CEO's can continue to have their ridiculous needs met.


    I'm sorry but this all seems so wrong to me.
  • Anthem Increases
    Anthem/Wellpoint hit our manufacturing company with a 34.5% increasse in monthly premiums this year. That is an increase from $36K per month to $48.5K per month. These guys are ruthlessly damaging our country's manufactuing base with thier rate increases. Someone needs to put a stop to this. Washington is not usually the answer but companies like Wellpoint cannot self regulate. Braly's 2009 Comp - $13.1M She makes all the jokes about lawyers seem very true!!

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.