Buckingham reignites plan for Lantern Commons project

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Buckingham Cos. is planning to develop the long-dormant Lantern Commons project at 161st Street and U.S. 31 in Westfield.

A conceptual plan filed with the city by the Indianapolis-based developer shows a mix of residential and retail uses, with anchor space totaling up to 150,000 square feet along the highway.

To the east, three outlots also would be available for retail uses and would front a newly built Poplar Street. The street, shown winding through the property, would separate the retail portion of the project from apartment units to the north.

The 63-acre property at the northeast corner of 161st and U.S. 31 hit the market last September after Illinois-based Pine Tree Commercial Realty proposed an upscale retail project in 2007 totaling 430,000 square feet that never got off the ground.

A call to Buckingham was not returned Monday morning. But the listing agent for the property, Bill French of Cassidy Turley, said the developer has the land under contract and is seeking to amend the planned-unit development ordinance to meet its needs.

“Right now, it’s in the embryo stage of moving forward,” French said.

Buckingham is set to introduce its plans Monday evening to the Westfield City Council, which will take no immediate action. The developer’s request to amend the PUD is scheduled to be heard by the city Plan Commission Sept. 2 at a public hearing and could be approved by the commission Sept. 18 before heading back to the City Council for final approval.

Westfield’s land-use plan, adopted in 2008, calls for limited retail along U.S. 31. City leaders envision the highway developing as an employment corridor, and the 161st Street interchange is the only undeveloped retail node along the route.

Sitehawk Retail Real Estate served as Pine Tree’s broker for the project until 2008.

“It’s a site that makes a lot of sense,” Sitehawk principal Mark Perlstein said. “The road construction’s going to be completed. From a geographic standpoint and where the growth is going, it could be a great project.”


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............