IBJNews

'Buy local' law doesn't sting Indy sewer project

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A new state law that could add to the cost of public works projects didn’t impact one of Indianapolis’ most sizable bids this year.

Bids for a section of a massive sewer project came in between $5 million and $90 million below the estimated cost of roughly $275 million, officials from the city’s Department of Public Works said Friday. 

State law used to stipulate that bids be awarded to the firm that offered the lowest price and met specified criteria, but a new so-called “buy local” law requires municipalities to give preference to local bidders. 

David Sherman, the city’s public works director, said none of the nine firms that bid on Indianapolis' massive project were local.

Because of the level of expertise required for the project–a deep rock tunnel to add storage capacity for raw sewage–the bids were from big players in the tunneling field, Sherman said. Most were joint ventures.

“The nine we got are big-name firms,” Sherman said. “We got all the national and international players.”

The apparent low bidder is a partnership between California-based J.F. Shea Co. and Nebraska-based Kiewit, which offered a bid of $185.4 million. The bids will be awarded in October.

City officials estimated the so-called “buy local” law had the potential to drive up costs for the project by about $3 million, but some legal experts who have studied the law say it could have been millions more.

The law, which went into effect July 1, stipulates that firms in counties where public works projects are bid–or adjacent counties–get a leg up in the bidding process by receiving a price preference on their bids.

For projects of $100,000 or more, local governments must adjust a local firm’s bid to be 1 percent lower than what the firm actually offered. But the firms, according to some interpretations of the law, still get paid what they originally offered. That could result in local governments paying more for projects, should the local bidders be awarded the contract.

Others say the law goes further, requiring government units to award the bid to the local firm, regardless of cost.

Sherman said it’s likely the “buy local” law will impact future Indianapolis public works projects, which will include road and street work that require less-specialized bidders. He said it’s unclear how it will impact the cost of those projects, though, since most of the bidders for those kinds of projects tend to be local, anyway.

Citizens Energy Group, which will become the utilities’ official owner Aug. 26, will select the winning bidder in the deep rock tunnel project. Sherman said the city bid out the project prior to the transfer to meet federally mandated timelines.

Savings on the deep rock tunnel bid will reduce the overall cost of the $3 billion sewer overhaul project. That will help curb rate increases that are needed to fund the project.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Local?
    Crown Point isn't in an adjacent county. It's about as far away as you can get and still be in Indiana, in fact - Lake County. The "Buy Local" law is just that - LOCAL. In order to receive the bid preference, it would have to be within the metro area - Indianapolis/Marion County or one of the "donut" counties: Boone, Hamilton, Madison, Hendricks, Hancock, Morgan, Johnson, and Shelby.
  • Oops
    I meant to say there was ONE Indiana company instead of Indianapolis in my previous comment.
  • Not True
    Regarding the comment released by David Sherman regarding the bids for the Deep Rock Tunnel project bids there was ONE Indianapolis company who bid this project and that was Walsh/VINCI Joint Venture, 1260 East Summit Street, Crown Point, IN 46307. 219-661-2450.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

    2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

    3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

    4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

    5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

    ADVERTISEMENT