IBJNews

'Buy local' law doesn't sting Indy sewer project

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A new state law that could add to the cost of public works projects didn’t impact one of Indianapolis’ most sizable bids this year.

Bids for a section of a massive sewer project came in between $5 million and $90 million below the estimated cost of roughly $275 million, officials from the city’s Department of Public Works said Friday. 

State law used to stipulate that bids be awarded to the firm that offered the lowest price and met specified criteria, but a new so-called “buy local” law requires municipalities to give preference to local bidders. 

David Sherman, the city’s public works director, said none of the nine firms that bid on Indianapolis' massive project were local.

Because of the level of expertise required for the project–a deep rock tunnel to add storage capacity for raw sewage–the bids were from big players in the tunneling field, Sherman said. Most were joint ventures.

“The nine we got are big-name firms,” Sherman said. “We got all the national and international players.”

The apparent low bidder is a partnership between California-based J.F. Shea Co. and Nebraska-based Kiewit, which offered a bid of $185.4 million. The bids will be awarded in October.

City officials estimated the so-called “buy local” law had the potential to drive up costs for the project by about $3 million, but some legal experts who have studied the law say it could have been millions more.

The law, which went into effect July 1, stipulates that firms in counties where public works projects are bid–or adjacent counties–get a leg up in the bidding process by receiving a price preference on their bids.

For projects of $100,000 or more, local governments must adjust a local firm’s bid to be 1 percent lower than what the firm actually offered. But the firms, according to some interpretations of the law, still get paid what they originally offered. That could result in local governments paying more for projects, should the local bidders be awarded the contract.

Others say the law goes further, requiring government units to award the bid to the local firm, regardless of cost.

Sherman said it’s likely the “buy local” law will impact future Indianapolis public works projects, which will include road and street work that require less-specialized bidders. He said it’s unclear how it will impact the cost of those projects, though, since most of the bidders for those kinds of projects tend to be local, anyway.

Citizens Energy Group, which will become the utilities’ official owner Aug. 26, will select the winning bidder in the deep rock tunnel project. Sherman said the city bid out the project prior to the transfer to meet federally mandated timelines.

Savings on the deep rock tunnel bid will reduce the overall cost of the $3 billion sewer overhaul project. That will help curb rate increases that are needed to fund the project.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Local?
    Crown Point isn't in an adjacent county. It's about as far away as you can get and still be in Indiana, in fact - Lake County. The "Buy Local" law is just that - LOCAL. In order to receive the bid preference, it would have to be within the metro area - Indianapolis/Marion County or one of the "donut" counties: Boone, Hamilton, Madison, Hendricks, Hancock, Morgan, Johnson, and Shelby.
  • Oops
    I meant to say there was ONE Indiana company instead of Indianapolis in my previous comment.
  • Not True
    Regarding the comment released by David Sherman regarding the bids for the Deep Rock Tunnel project bids there was ONE Indianapolis company who bid this project and that was Walsh/VINCI Joint Venture, 1260 East Summit Street, Crown Point, IN 46307. 219-661-2450.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

    2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

    3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

    4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

    5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.

    ADVERTISEMENT