IBJNews

Candy Dynamics expands Nuclear Sludge recall

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Carmel-based Candy Dynamics has expanded a voluntary recall of its Toxic Waste brand Nuclear Sludge products because they may contain too much lead.

Earlier this month, the company recalled all flavors of its 0.7-ounce Nuclear Sludge Chew Bars because tests showed elevated levels of lead in a batch of cherry-flavored candy. On Thursday, it added the 0.3-ounce size to the recall.

The candy was imported from Pakistan and distributed nationwide through retail stores and mail orders.

Company officials were not available for comment Monday afternoon, but Candy Dynamics said in a prepared statement that it would discontinue the sale of Nuclear Sludge products.

“Further testing by the company indicates that while some of the smaller sized products were below the FDA limit, some contain elevated levels of lead,” according to the statement, made available by the Food and Drug Administration and the Indiana Department of Health.

Overexposure to lead could damage nerve connections and cause blood and brain disorders, the Health Department said. Symptoms of lead toxicity include stomach aches, colic, nausea, vomiting and insomnia.

No lead-related illnesses have been reported, the statement said, and only the Nuclear Sludge products are affected by the recall.

Founded in 2006, Candy Dynamics made a name for itself with its unusual "double-action" sour recipe, eye-catching packaging and unforgettable names like Toxic Waste, Nuclear Sludge and Hi-Voltage Bubble Gum.

As IBJ reported this week, the startup—formally known as Circle City Marketing and Distributing—allegedly was funded with some of the assets from a failed business that sold dietary supplements called Mini Thins. Founder Richard A. Deer is facing allegations of bankruptcy fraud as a result.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • TOXIC WASTE of a COMPANY
    It appears that pushing ephederine on kids was not good enough for this evil company.
    Now the quality control is lacking in pushing candy.
    I agree with EddieB317...
    LET THE LAWSUITS FLY!
  • Well thats just ironic.
    I love how this company from carmel decided that a voluntary recall was a good idea for their candy because it had "too much" lead. Too much? Isn't any lead too much? Rule #1 in making candy... make sure it doesn't have lead in it.

    Well this has long term liability written all over it. Some kid eats their lead candy and five years later is diagnosed as being developmentally disabled. Then they go to court and some moron who made lead candy for kids has to stand in front of a jury and tell them how they failed to keep lead out of their "toxic waste" candy that they were selling to children.

    Wow. I hope this dope has a good defense team that is more competent at lawyering than he was at making candy.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...

ADVERTISEMENT