IBJNews

Carbon Motors’ Chapter 7 filing marks official end for firm

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A once-promising company that had planned to build high-tech police cars at a Connersville plant in eastern Indiana is officially kaput.

Carbon Motors Corp. filed for Chapter 7 liquidation in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Indianapolis on Friday, listing liabilities of $21.7 million and assets of just $18,976.

The assets consist of a prototype police car, miscellaneous furniture, books and records, and the company’s intellectual property, said Henry Efroymson, a partner at Ice Miller LLP, who is representing the company.

Much of the liabilities listed in the bankruptcy are claims from investors who had sunk millions of dollars into the company. Among the biggest claims: $3.6 million from Chicago billionaire Joe Mansueto, the founder and CEO of investment research firm Morningstar Inc.

Other debtors include German car company BMW and Troy, Mich.-based Inteva Products LLC, both suppliers to Carbon Motors, who claim they are owed more than $3 million between them.

The company fell apart after the U.S. Department of Energy rejected the company’s request for a $310 million loan last year.

“The entire business model was premised on that entire loan coming through,” Efroymson said. “It was a huge, unexpected disappointment for management as well as the investors.”

Carbon Motors announced in July 2009 that it would move into the vacant Visteon plant in Connersville, hire as many as 1,500 workers and begin making the high-tech police cars.

But the entire operation largely hinged on the government loan, which the Department of Energy denied in March 2012.

For Carbon Motors, the bankruptcy protects it from any litigation brought against the company, including a lawsuit filed in May by three former executive vice presidents seeking more than $600,000 in deferred wages.

The Connersville News-Examiner reported on May 22 that Trevor Rudderham, Alan Bratt and Keith Marchiando were suing in Fayette Circuit Court to collect back wages that they claimed the defunct company had promised to pay them by March 1.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Hoax
    Carbon Motors NEVER was promising! This was designed as a scam to obtain government money and then go bankrupt. We should be thankful they were turned down for Federal $$$.
  • Totally agree Tom
    I totally agree Tom. I'm a lifelong Connersville resident (please don't hold that against me) who said from Day 1 that the 'Phantom Motors' thing would never materialize. Santana Li and Connersville Mayor Leonard Urban called us doubters "naysayers" and worse, but who is getting investigated by the FBI? Not the naysayers, but the 'willing' participants in this total scam. I sure wish / hope the Indianapolis Star is continuing its investigation of 'Connersville government.' So many things that 'might be improper.' - kh
  • Your Right Rad
    Kinda like the governments money losing green energy subsidies. Rape and Pillage the taxpayer.
  • bad idea
    Carbon Motors was a scam from the beginning. No police department would buy a whole fleet of high priced specialty vehicles from an upstart company. Had the federal loan been approved the executives and initial investors would have made more, but the federal government would have had nothing but empty promises to show for that $310 million dollar loan.
    • Agreed
      They should of tried Police Bikes, Feds gave $1.5 million for a Bike rental company!
    • Smoke & Mirrors
      This police car was never a viable proposition. It was too complicated, too expensive for any police department, too restrictive (only factory service locations could work on it) and too foreign. A puff job from the beginning and as the years went on, even the vaunted technology got mouldy. I don't belive there was any real possibility of it being built, much less sold, and the government rejection of the loan was certainly prudent (and a convenient excuse to oshut off the life support).

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

      2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

      3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

      4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

      5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

      ADVERTISEMENT