IBJNews

Cargolux adding third weekly European cargo flight

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Roche Diagnostics Corp. is ramping up cargo shipments between the U.S. and Europe, securing a third weekly Cargolux flight at Indianapolis International Airport to ship its medical products overseas.

The flight, to begin on Sunday, will be the first scheduled Cargolux flight to depart Indianapolis and fly nonstop to Europe – opening up new export capabilities from central Indiana.

Currently, Cargolux Airlines International operates two inbound flights from Luxembourg to Indianapolis, each Wednesday and Friday

Boeing 747 freighters – an uncommon sight at Indianapolis  – typically take on Roche’s chemical reagents and medical devices then stop in Chicago or other cities before heading back to Europe.

The new flight will help Roche better synchronize its supply chain, said Thurman Walker, general manager of DB Schenker’s Indianapolis logistics center, which handles Roche’s shipments at the airport.

The goods will be loaded at the airport when Roche’s local operations are closed. But they will arrive in Europe for timelier processing. That could speed deliveries to customers there by two days, said Jim Lafayette, director of distribution operations for Roche.

The outbound Boeing 747 will have room for additional cargo. “Hopefully our volume will keep growing,” said Eric Martin, head of North American supply chain at Roche.

That extra aircraft capacity also could accommodate goods of other companies wanting to ship to Europe.

The third Cargolux flight is a boon for the Indianapolis Airport Authority, which for years has been touting the airport as an alternative to bigger and more congested airports such as delay-prone Chicago O’Hare.

Indianapolis International is the nation’s eighth largest cargo airport, although most of the cargo moves via a single company – FedEx.  The Memphis carrier operates its second-largest domestic cargo hubin Indianapolis.

Further diversification--Cargolux’s new flight-- helps underscore that “Indianapolis is a legitimate player” in cargo, said Christofer Matney, air service director for the airport authority.

Matney travels the world pitching Indianapolis’ cargo potential, which has grown since the airport opened a new midfield passenger terminal almost four years ago. The site of the abandoned former passenger terminal is ripe for cargo operations, with direct access to the airfield.

There’s more than 2 million square feet of such airfield access on the northeast corner of the airport alone for wide-body freight aircraft. That’s an amount roughly equivalent to what O’Hare has today.

Indianapolis has seen a number of new international cargo flights over the last couple years. In November, FedEx won federal approval to launch an air cargo route between Indianapolis and Guadalajara, Mexico.

FedEx, which employs about 4,000 people at its Indianapolis hub, also has been making regularly scheduled flights from Indianapolis to Paris-Charles de Gaulle Airport.

Two years ago, FedEx began nonstop service from Hong Kong to Indianapolis.

Cargo is big business for Indianapolis International, a medium-sized airport that is more a spoke than a hub for passenger service and thus has struggled to land nonstop passenger flights to Europe.

FedEx alone pays more in landing fees than all 10 passenger carriers here – about $10.4 million annually vs. $10 million for the passenger airlines.

In the first nine months of 2011, FedEx shipped 1.45 billion pounds of cargo at Indianapolis International, or 724,619 tons.

Cargolux began the first nonstop air cargo service here from Europe in 2006, quickly adding a second flight to serve Roche and Schenker.

“Six years ago, these guys took a very bold step,” said Matney, who hopes to continue to attract additional cargo flights.

 

 

   

ADVERTISEMENT

  • A step in the right direction for Indianapolis Int.
    Great writeup Chris, hopefully this will keep jobs in the area and encourage more companies to follow suite. Indianapolis International has been struggling to raise its profile for many years as a viable jump point for cargo - like you say, O'Hare doesn't exactly have the best record on file, but businesses are at least confident that it has the necessary infrastructure in place, regardless of delays. Hopefully, the Roche deal will go one step further to encouraging firms to use Indianapolis as an alternative for air cargo aircraft and other cargo-related business. I think it's important that Indianapolis now puts in place a strong multi-channel campaign to reassure businesses that it can handle their projects with capacity to spare, and possibly offer rebates for multi-year customers. The more it can continue to work with cargo successfully, the more the market will slowly come to recognise it as a genuine alternative to Chicago O'Hare.
  • FedEx HKG-IND
    FedEx flew Hong Kong - Indianapolis for two months and has not flown that route for over a year.
  • Indianapolis Cargo Hub
    The combination of the Euro financial crisis making U.S. products cheaper and DHL closing its cargo hub in Ohio has really made Indianapolis a lot more attractive for European exporting.

    The former airport terminal is ripe for redevelopment as a intermodal cargo hub.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT