IBJNews

Cell phone retailer to establish Carmel office, hire 145

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Cellular Connection, a Marion-based cell phone retailer with nearly 900 locations in 28 states, plans to open a corporate office in Carmel and hire as many as 145 employees within three years.

The firm will occupy a 47,000-square-foot building that it acquired earlier this year at 525 Congressional Blvd. Purchasing and building out the property will run about $5 million, said Scott Moorehead, CEO of parent firm Moorehead Communications Inc.

The Carmel space is expected to be ready for occupancy in August. It will serve as a satellite corporate office for the company, which will retain its Marion headquarters, Moorehead said.

“I think it was time to broaden our base of eligible employees,” Moorehead said of establishing a presence in Carmel. “We were out of space here [in Marion], and we have been hiring people left and right.

“A lot of them are commuting in [from the Indianapolis area]. Carmel is attractive to people from the south side of indianapolis who don’t want to be drive to Marion.”

The Carmel office will include back-office employees such as accounting and finance workers, programming engineers, legal staff, call center support workers, graphic designers and marketers. It also will feature a mock store for training, and a gym for employees.

In December, the Indiana Economic Development Corp. offered Moorehead Communications $1.2 million in conditional tax credits for its job-creation plans and up to $200,000 in training grants.

The Cellular Connection is a descendant of a small electric company started in 1939 that now operates as a Verizon Wireless partner retailer. TCC also is a dealer for DISH Network.

It was founded in 1991 by Steve and Phyllis Moorehead. Scott, their son, became CEO in 2008. Moorehead Communications, which does business as The Cellular Connection, currently employs about 1,700.

Moorehead takes pride in flying under the radar. The firm posted revenue of $606 million in its 2012 fiscal year, which would make it the 19th-largest private company in Indiana. However, it hardly is a household name.

The company posted revenue of $466.2 million in 2011, according to its profile in Inc. magazine’s 2012 list of the nation’s fastest-growing companies. It ranked 1,294th on the list, with revenue increasing 239 percent since 2008.

The chain’s growth got a boost in 2010 when it landed a deal to operate cellular kiosks inside HHGregg stores.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I'm a CPA who works with a wide range of companies (through my firm K.B.Parrish & Co.); however, we work with quite a few car dealerships, so I'm fairly interested in Fatwin (mentioned in the article). Does anyone have much information on that, or a link to such information? Thanks.

  2. Historically high long-term unemployment, unprecedented labor market slack and the loss of human capital should not be accepted as "the economy at work [and] what is supposed to happen" and is certainly not raising wages in Indiana. See Chicago Fed Reserve: goo.gl/IJ4JhQ Also, here's our research on Work Sharing and our support testimony at yesterday's hearing: goo.gl/NhC9W4

  3. I am always curious why teachers don't believe in accountability. It's the only profession in the world that things they are better than everyone else. It's really a shame.

  4. It's not often in Indiana that people from both major political parties and from both labor and business groups come together to endorse a proposal. I really think this is going to help create a more flexible labor force, which is what businesses claim to need, while also reducing outright layoffs, and mitigating the impact of salary/wage reductions, both of which have been highlighted as important issues affecting Hoosier workers. Like many other public policies, I'm sure that this one will, over time, be tweaked and changed as needed to meet Indiana's needs. But when you have such broad agreement, why not give this a try?

  5. I could not agree more with Ben's statement. Every time I look at my unemployment insurance rate, "irritated" hardly describes my sentiment. We are talking about a surplus of funds, and possibly refunding that, why, so we can say we did it and get a notch in our political belt? This is real money, to real companies, large and small. The impact is felt across the board; in the spending of the company, the hiring (or lack thereof due to higher insurance costs), as well as in the personal spending of the owners of a smaller company.

ADVERTISEMENT