IBJNews

Central Indiana city looks to relax business sign rules

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Greenfield officials are proposing new measures to relax the city's strict sign standards.

At the request of Mayor Dick Pasco, a committee of city officials and private business owners in the Hancock County city just east of Indianapolis picked over the sign ordinance to look at changes that could make it more "business friendly."

Relaxing the ordinance, which was overhauled just two years ago, was one of Pasco's first initiatives after taking office in January.

"I wanted to be a little more friendly to local businesses," Pasco told the Daily Reporter. "When you have a sluggish economy, it becomes a little more clear how important signage can be."

The committee has proposed a number of changes that will give business owners and residents more options.

Joanie Fitzwater, city planning director, said the revisions also help clarify language and definitions that made the previous ordinance hard to navigate.

The biggest proposed changes will be to electronic signs and temporary signs.

Previously, electronic signs were required to hold a message static for five minutes. The committee is proposing to reduce that time limit to one minute, which will match county sign ordinance provisions.

Pasco said the five-minute restriction essentially rendered electronic signs pointless.

"It defeats the purpose of investing in those type signs," he said. "This is a little more reasonable for businesses."

If the new sign ordinance is approved, there will be a rule change to allow free-standing temporary signs. The current ordinance only allows for temporary signs, like banners, to be attached to a structure.

"This is where we're really trying to help business," Fitzwater said.

Jeff Inskeep, owner of Inskeep Ford, said his business will take advantage of the changes, should they be approved. Free-standing temporary signs could help drive traffic to the dealership during special sales and promotions, he said.

"The more signage, the more attention it attracts," Inskeep said. "It'll give a little bit of added exposure for promotions we don't have time to make up an ad for; tire sales, brake sales, something like that."

Fitzwater said the challenge in amending the new sign ordinance was to make sure changes intended to help businesses did not inadvertently endanger drivers or impede upon city aesthetic. The changes, she said, are a good balance of both.

"We want to balance the needs of the community, with our need to have signs that are safe, with needs of businesses," Fitzwater said.

Other changes include slight increases on sizes for certain types of signage, added standards for garage sales signs, removal of permit requirements for non-commercial opinion signs over nine square feet (like political signs) and removal of a standard restricting the number of wall signs allowed.

Mike Rees, principal at SR 9 Development LP, owner of Brandywine Plaza and Brandywine Crossing, said his tenant, Kroger, has never been happy with the height of the sign for its gas station, which sits lower due to the current ordinance's measuring standards. The change would so it is be more visible to motorists on Indiana 9.

"Visibility is absolutely critical," Rees said.

The majority of the changes affect properties in business and industrial zones, though some changes were made to sign standards in the historic district, including more lenient requirements for sign materials.

The proposed changes will be taken up by the Plan Commission next week. If approved there, they will move on to the city council. To be on the books for 2013, the changes have to receive final approval before the end of the year.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • How bright can it be?
    What about limitation on how bright these electronic signs can be? Some of them are ridiculously bright and certainly traffic hazards.
  • Easier Solution
    If they're worried about regulations like how long a message must be static on an electronic sign, they could just do like Indianapolis inspectors do and ignore the violations. That seems to work just fine for IPS schools where they agreed that their messages would remain static for at least eight seconds, but in reality they change every second or two.
  • Be Careful
    Be careful not to throw the baby out with the bath water. Sign ordinances need to be amended from time to time to stay current and eliminate confusion. What ever you do don't relax the requirements and allow a proliferation of sign clutter. This is not friendly to business, it hurts business.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Kent's done a good job of putting together some good guests, intelligence and irreverence without the inane chatter of the other two shows. JMV is unlistenable, mostly because he doesn't do his homework and depends on non-sports stuff to keep HIM interested. Query and Shultz is a bit better, but lack of prep in their show certainly is evident. Sterling obviously workes harder than the other shows. We shall see if there is any way for a third signal with very little successful recent history to make it. I always say you have to give a show two years to grow into what it will become...

  2. Lafayette Square, Washington Square should be turned into office parks with office buildings, conversion, no access to the public at all. They should not be shopping malls and should be under tight security and used for professional offices instead of havens for crime. Their only useage is to do this or tear them down and replace them with high rise office parks with secured parking lots so that the crime in the areas is not allowed in. These are prime properties, but must be reused for other uses, professional office conversions with no loitering and no shopping makes sense, otherwise they have become hangouts long ago for gangs, groups of people who have no intent of spending money, and are only there for trouble and possibly crime, shoplifting, etc. I worked summers at SuperX Drugs in Lafayette Square in the 1970s and even then the shrinkage from shoplifting was 10-15 percent. No sense having shopping malls in these areas, they earn no revenue, attract crime, and are a blight on the city. All malls that are not of use should be repurposed or torn down by the city, condemned. One possibility would be to repourpose them as inside college campuses or as community centers, but then again, if the community is high crime, why bother.

  3. Straight No Chaser

  4. Seems the biggest use of TIF is for pet projects that improve Quality Of Life, allegedly, but they ignore other QOL issues that are of a more important and urgent nature. Keep it transparent and try not to get in ready, fire, Aim! mode. You do realize that business the Mayor said might be interested is probably going to want TIF too?

  5. Gary, I'm in complete agreement. The private entity should be required to pay IPL, and, if City parking meters are involved, the parking meter company. I was just pointing out how the poorly-structured parking meter deal affected the car share deal.

ADVERTISEMENT