IBJNews

Chamber prez Miller resigns after 18 months

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Scott Miller, who merged several business organizations under the umbrella of the Indy Chamber, has resigned as chamber president after about 18 months on the job, the group announced Thursday morning.

His resignation will be effective May 31.

Miller told IBJ Thursday that he began thinking about returning to the private sector after he was presented opportunities with startup companies. At age 45, he realized he had accomplished his larger goals at the chamber and missed being involved in an entrepreneurial company.

“It’s kind of a tough decision,” he said. “But it’s a decision I’ve been thinking about for awhile. It was just kind of a time for reflection.”

Miller was named president in October 2011, succeeding Roland Dorson.

Miller came to the Chamber through another not-for-profit, Develop Indy. He joined the city’s economic development arm in 2008, then in February 2011 merged operations with the like-minded economic group Indy Partnership, which represented the nine-county Indianapolis area.

After being named chamber president, he managed the group's mergers with Develop Indy as well as the Business Ownership Initiative and the World Trade Club of Indiana.

Miller said that the mergers allowed him to redirect between $200,000 and $300,000 within the groups' $13 million in combined revenue for the Chamber's push for improved mass transit and other priorities.

A certified public accountant by training, Miller was president of the commercial landscape and maintenance company Mainscape Inc. prior to joining Develop Indy.

Chamber Chairman John Thompson on Thursday credited Miller with the mergers as well as increasing chamber participation of large organizations including Eli Lilly Credit Union, Indiana Pacers and Ivy Tech Community College—and drawing more money from the organizations.

“He’s a good salesman,” Thompson said.

The chamber likely will continue in its existing mission of creating an environment in which its members’ businesses can thrive, including its ongoing push for  transit, Thompson said.

The likelihood of replacing Miller with someone already working in central Indiana is high, Thompson said: “I see many, many strong candidate prospects.” The group will not conduct a national search, Thompson said.

Mayor Greg Ballard issued a statement thanking Miller for merging Develop Indy and the chamber into a “single, strong voice” for the business community.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • The Truth
    Ohhh. I would say I KNOW more than you think there Faith! If that is even your real name. Trust me, I know way more!!
  • Careful
    Kala, I'd be careful making accusations you know nothing about.
    • Wow
      He resigned because he had to do so. PERIOD.
      • john
        Nice guy with a wonderful wife. Good luck!
        • Reality appears to Bite..
          As the Chamber licks it's wounds after spending a lot of money lobbying in favor of more federal control over central Indiana through Common Core educational standards and the 'Mass Transit Initiative', their leader decides to return to the private sector. One wonders what the effect of member companies' resignation from the Chamber due to it's support of these boondoggles had to do with Miller's 'time of reflection'?

        Post a comment to this story

        COMMENTS POLICY
        We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
         
        You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
         
        Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
         
        No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
         
        We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
         

        Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

        Sponsored by
        ADVERTISEMENT

        facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

        Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
        Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
         
        Subscribe to IBJ
        1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

        2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

        3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

        4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

        5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

        ADVERTISEMENT