IBJNews

Charges drive down first-quarter profit at Lilly

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

First-quarter profit fell at Eli Lilly and Co. as the company recorded restructuring charges due to its downsizing and higher research costs as it tries to develop new drugs to help it shrug off its looming patent expirations.

Excluding those charges, however, the Indianapolis-based drugmaker appeared to beat the expectations of Wall Street analysts.

Lilly earned $1.1 billion, or 95 cents per share, during the three months ended March 31. Those results were at least 15 percent lower than during the same quarter a year ago.

Lilly spent $76.3 million on severance as it continues its efforts to trim 5,500 workers by year’s end. It also spent another $26 million on its restructuring efforts. And two research partnerships—with Germany-based Boehringer Ingelheim and with Australia-based Acrux Ltd.—cost the company $438 million in the quarter.

Without those charges, Lilly would have earned $1.24 per share. Analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters, who typically exclude special charges from their forecasts, were expecting $1.16 per share.

Sales at Lilly rose 6 percent to $5.84 billion, mainly on the strength of international sales. Analysts were expecting revenue of $5.7 billion.

“This revenue growth allowed us to make necessary investments in research and development to address the challenges of upcoming patent expirations," Lilly CEO John Lechleiter said in a statement. "We are on track to deliver on our 2011 headcount and expense reduction targets, as well as our goal of having at least 10 potential new medicines in Phase 3 clinical development by the end of this year.”

At the end of October, Lilly will lose U.S. and European patent protection on its bestseller, the antipsychotic Zyprexa, which had $5 billion in sales last year. Then in 2013, Lilly will lose U.S. and European patent protection on its No. 2 drug, Cymbalta.

In both cases, cheap generic copies will quickly sap most of those drugs’ sales.

Lilly lowered its full-year profit forecast by about 6 cents per share—to reflect its restructuring charges. It now expects to earn $3.86 to $4.01 per share.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The east side does have potential...and I have always thought Washington Scare should become an outlet mall. Anyone remember how popular Eastgate was? Well, Indy has no outlet malls, we have to go to Edinburgh for the deep discounts and I don't understand why. Jim is right. We need a few good eastsiders interested in actually making some noise and trying to change the commerce, culture and stereotypes of the East side. Irvington is very progressive and making great strides, why can't the far east side ride on their coat tails to make some changes?

  2. Boston.com has an article from 2010 where they talk about how Interactions moved to Massachusetts in the year prior. http://www.boston.com/business/technology/innoeco/2010/07/interactions_banks_63_million.html The article includes a link back to that Inside Indiana Business press release I linked to earlier, snarkily noting, "Guess this 2006 plan to create 200-plus new jobs in Indiana didn't exactly work out."

  3. I live on the east side and I have read all your comments. a local paper just did an article on Washington square mall with just as many comments and concerns. I am not sure if they are still around, but there was an east side coalition with good intentions to do good things on the east side. And there is a facebook post that called my eastside indy with many old members of the eastside who voice concerns about the east side of the city. We need to come together and not just complain and moan, but come up with actual concrete solutions, because what Dal said is very very true- the eastside could be a goldmine in the right hands. But if anyone is going damn, and change things, it is us eastside residents

  4. Please go back re-read your economics text book and the fine print on the February 2014 CBO report. A minimum wage increase has never resulted in a net job loss...

  5. The GOP at the Statehouse is more interested in PR to keep their majority, than using it to get anything good actually done. The State continues its downward spiral.

ADVERTISEMENT