IBJNews

Charter school lands more time in fight against closure

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Leaders of The Project School in Indianapolis will get another chance to state their case for keeping the school open after winning a restraining order late Tuesday.

Mayor Greg Ballard announced July 17 that he planned to revoke the school's charter due to poor test scores and financial issues, but the school balked at the decsion in a formal response three days later and filed for an injunction Monday to stop the revocation.

Ballard, however, emphasized that decision Tuesday afternoon by issuing a "final notice of charter revocation" to the school after hearing its response.

"After thoughtful and careful consideration of the school's July 20, 2012 response, it was determined the school did not meet the standards established for Mayor-sponsored charter schools," the mayor said in a prepared statement. "Therefore, The Project School's charter is hereby revoked, effective immediately."

But later Tuesday, Project School supporters won a temporary restraining order from Marion Superior Court Judge John Hanley that will stop the mayor's revocation until the court can rule on the injunction. The judge scheduled a hearing Monday morning to hear the case.

“If this decision to revoke The Project School’s charter stands, it will be a tremendous loss to our students, their families and our local neighborhood,” said Daniel Baron, president of the school’s board, in a written statement coinciding with the Monday court filing.

Baron said Tuesday morning that school leaders were confident a fair review would show that the mayor’s staff has misunderstood the school's academic progress and misrepresented its financial status.

The 4-year-old school, which is publicly funded, has never seen more than 30 percent of its students pass both the math and reading portions of the state standardized ISTEP test.

This year, the passage rate for the school’s 311 students in grades K-8 was 28.9 percent, according to data released this month by the Indiana Department of Education.

“The Project School ranks among the worst performing schools in Marion County and in the entire state,” Ballard said July 17 in a prepared statement. He added that the school’s 2012 academic results likely would produce an “F” grade under the state’s new accountability standards.

But school leaders argued in their response that it was chartered as a non-traditional program with a mission to teach some of the state’s most troubled children, and that the school’s approach is working.

They cited statistics that show all students in the fourth and eighth grades who have been at the school for at least three years passed the English and math portions of the ISTEP test. The school did not say how many students that included.

The mayor’s intial notice of revocation claims The Project School has run a deficit in each of the last three years and now has accumulated nearly $5.3 million in debt. The notice also stated that the school delayed paying its staff this month by one week because it had so little cash on hand.

School leaders, however, asserted that The Project School does not have a negative cash balance, but actually has a surplus.

The mayor’s “incorrect” assessment was based, in part, on the fact the school “depreciated” the value of a portion of the building it owns. Thus, the mayor’s office apparently considered the “depreciation” a hard-dollar expense when it was actually an accounting label and not a real cash cost to the school, they said.

The school is located at 1145 E. 22nd St.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Get all the facts
    If you're interested in the financials, you can see them at http://www.indianapolisprojectschool.org/. The school did not bounce payroll checks and did not miss payroll; this summer it switched to a new payroll schedule (from 26 to 24 payrolls), requiring a shifting of pay dates. Not an unusual business move.
  • Bouncing checks
    Hmm, you can talk about depreciating buildings, but if you owe 5.3 million more than you did three years ago and are bouncing staff payroll checks, it is much more than just an accounting thing. Explaining that a 29% pass rate is really much better shows the same lack of math skills. Sounds delusional to me.
  • $5.3 Million
    Would it matter that they have had an outside audit by the lender for the building they just PURCHASED? Is there NO value in owning their own building??
  • Save TPS
    When you walk into any IPS school there is at least a couple kids sitting waiting to talk to the principal because they are in trouble. If you walk in to TPS and see children in the office, they are helping the staff or they are ill. Thats it. NEVER once have I ever walked into a school FULL of happy, kind, polite children. IT is much more than just a school. It IS a community. SAVE THE PROJECT SCHOOL.
  • Close it
    $5.3 million in debt for 313 total students is unacceptable.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

    ADVERTISEMENT