IBJNews

CIB audit shows agency finances improving

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The Capital Improvement Board’s financial outlook is looking a lot less gloomy as it continues to negotiate over who will pay Conseco Fieldhouse operating costs.

The CIB’s 2009 audit report, issued to the City-County Council’s Municipal Corporations Committee Thursday evening, shows the agency was $10 million in the black last year compared with a loss of $16.8 million in 2008.

Revenue slipped 4.6 percent, to $123.1 million. But the decrease was offset by an even more dramatic drop in expenses, which fell 22.5 percent, to $113.1 million in 2009.

The CIB has improved its finances by making $26 million in cuts and by delaying installments on $25.5 million in debt service reserve payments.

Staff reductions in 2009 resulted in a 14.4 percent drop in salaries and wages, to $11.3 million, according to the routine audit conducted by the State Board of Accounts. The CIB also reduced expenses related to repair and maintenance, security, parts and supplies.

The CIB anticipates meeting its financial obligations again this year, the audit said, but warned of continued volatility in the economy.

“Current economic conditions have made it difficult to predict future tax revenues,” the audit said. “A significant decline in tax revenues could have an adverse impact on the CIB’s future operating results.”

CIB revenue last year was hampered by a decrease in investment income and a drop in the amount of state and local taxes it collects—including the county innkeeper’s tax, food and beverage tax, admissions tax, auto rental excise tax, and a share of the state cigarette tax. But revenue would have been down even more in 2009 if not for a 1-percent increase in the innkeeper’s tax and an expansion of the Professional Sports Development Area to include the hotels that comprise the massive J.W. Marriott hotel complex.

Adding to the uncertainty is $15 million in annual Fieldhouse operating costs the CIB could inherit from the Indiana Pacers. The CIB owns the arena, where the Pacers and Indiana Fever play.

The Pacers’ current lease runs through 2019, but the team has an out clause if it is losing money. Pacers Sports & Entertainment contends it has been in the red every year but one since moving into Conseco Fieldhouse and can no longer afford to pay to operate the facility.

The team had hoped to have the situation resolved by June 30, but negoitiations continue.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Funny Economics
    The funny thing about the improved finances of the CIB is that the increase in the budget of the CIB was about the same amount as their reductions in spending for this year.
  • Accounting 101
    What about the explosion of long term debt to almost a billion dollars?

    What about the deferment of tens of millions in building maintenance and the elimination of all of CIB reserve accounts?

    What about those Capital Lease Agreements?

    The CIB has no money to give the Pacers anything.

    They gave it all to the Colts!

    P.S.

    Maybe the Pacers will provide their audited financials now that the CIB has shown theirs;)
  • Wrong
    It's a gross mistatement to say the contract has an "out clause if it is losing money." It contains a Early Termination provision that allows the Pacers to break the contract if the team is being sold and moved out of the city AND is losing money. Even then the penalties are about $150 million.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT