IBJNews

CIB audit shows agency finances improving

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Capital Improvement Board’s financial outlook is looking a lot less gloomy as it continues to negotiate over who will pay Conseco Fieldhouse operating costs.

The CIB’s 2009 audit report, issued to the City-County Council’s Municipal Corporations Committee Thursday evening, shows the agency was $10 million in the black last year compared with a loss of $16.8 million in 2008.

Revenue slipped 4.6 percent, to $123.1 million. But the decrease was offset by an even more dramatic drop in expenses, which fell 22.5 percent, to $113.1 million in 2009.

The CIB has improved its finances by making $26 million in cuts and by delaying installments on $25.5 million in debt service reserve payments.

Staff reductions in 2009 resulted in a 14.4 percent drop in salaries and wages, to $11.3 million, according to the routine audit conducted by the State Board of Accounts. The CIB also reduced expenses related to repair and maintenance, security, parts and supplies.

The CIB anticipates meeting its financial obligations again this year, the audit said, but warned of continued volatility in the economy.

“Current economic conditions have made it difficult to predict future tax revenues,” the audit said. “A significant decline in tax revenues could have an adverse impact on the CIB’s future operating results.”

CIB revenue last year was hampered by a decrease in investment income and a drop in the amount of state and local taxes it collects—including the county innkeeper’s tax, food and beverage tax, admissions tax, auto rental excise tax, and a share of the state cigarette tax. But revenue would have been down even more in 2009 if not for a 1-percent increase in the innkeeper’s tax and an expansion of the Professional Sports Development Area to include the hotels that comprise the massive J.W. Marriott hotel complex.

Adding to the uncertainty is $15 million in annual Fieldhouse operating costs the CIB could inherit from the Indiana Pacers. The CIB owns the arena, where the Pacers and Indiana Fever play.

The Pacers’ current lease runs through 2019, but the team has an out clause if it is losing money. Pacers Sports & Entertainment contends it has been in the red every year but one since moving into Conseco Fieldhouse and can no longer afford to pay to operate the facility.

The team had hoped to have the situation resolved by June 30, but negoitiations continue.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Funny Economics
    The funny thing about the improved finances of the CIB is that the increase in the budget of the CIB was about the same amount as their reductions in spending for this year.
  • Accounting 101
    What about the explosion of long term debt to almost a billion dollars?

    What about the deferment of tens of millions in building maintenance and the elimination of all of CIB reserve accounts?

    What about those Capital Lease Agreements?

    The CIB has no money to give the Pacers anything.

    They gave it all to the Colts!

    P.S.

    Maybe the Pacers will provide their audited financials now that the CIB has shown theirs;)
  • Wrong
    It's a gross mistatement to say the contract has an "out clause if it is losing money." It contains a Early Termination provision that allows the Pacers to break the contract if the team is being sold and moved out of the city AND is losing money. Even then the penalties are about $150 million.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...

ADVERTISEMENT