IBJNews

CIB improves financial situation with more cuts

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The Indianapolis Capital Improvement Board’s dire financial situation might be improving enough that it may forego the first installment of a $27 million state loan.

State legislators this summer authorized the CIB to receive $27 million—$9 million in annual loans the state will provide for three years—to help close the CIB’s budget shortfall.

The CIB, which manages the city’s professional sports facilities and the Indiana Convention Center, has struggled much of the year to close a projected $47 million deficit for 2010.

But CIB Treasurer Ann Lathrop said at its Tuesday meeting the group may not need the $9 million in 2009, which would save the CIB from paying interest charges of 5.25 percent.

The CIB will decide at its December meeting whether to accept the loan. Even if it turns down the first installment, it still could choose to accept the remaining funds earmarked for 2010 and 2011.

CIB President Bob Grand cautioned that although the group’s finances are much improved, more work remains. 

“We do know we’re healthier than we were a year ago,” he said. “But the point of the matter is, this is an ongoing issue.”

The group reduced spending by closing on a substitute credit facility, to retire $25.4 million of a debt service reserve.

It also has cut several positions and reduced salaries on others. The CIB has eliminated 11 full-time salaried positions—nine on Friday and two today. Lathrop declined to disclose what positions were cut.

CIB executives accepted permanent salary reductions of 5 percent to 20 percent, and union contracts for convention center workers were negotiated with no salary increases and changes to overtime policies.

Also, the CIB through August spent $650,000 on improvements to its properties, when it typically spends $3 million in annual upgrades.

The CIB anticipates spending $50 million of its $63 million budget in 2010, which could leave it with a cash balance of $36 million.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In my opinion the estridge companies are crooks. They filed bankruptcy on their 'track housing' side of the business two weeks before they closed on one of my clients' homes. When my client first interviewed Estridge as a builder 6 months before, they specifically ASKED about the solvency of their business, knowing that some builders were struggling. Estridge truly misrepresented their financial situation at that time. I suppose I am more unhappy with the whole system than I am with the builder because what the heck==you can file bankruptcy on 'track homes' but still keep building and make money off of 'custom built' homes??? How ridiculous! They are all homes. How can a company be allowed to bilk thousands of dollars from their subcontractors but still be allowed to build houses?? they should have been made to pay back all their unpaid contractors before being allowed to profit from building any more houses! This alone makes them and the system crooks in my eyes. I would never build an estridge home and I would not recommend for my clients either. If they were truly 'bankrupt' how could they afford to keep building homes anyway??? The whole system needs fixed.

  2. I live a couple blocks east of the Angie's campus and my house is assessed for ~$160,000. If I could get that amount, let alone $384,000 (a 140% bonus), I'd sell in a minute. Either Angie's stockholders just got fleeced, or Angie's is getting about a 58% discount on their property taxes, if these properties are actually worth what they paid Mr. Oesterle for them. Which do you think is the case?

  3. Perhaps the IMA board is really to blame! They agreed to hire Charles. They can't seemingly find donors among themselves, or bring in new blood that will support the museums operating budget with an expanded museum and money to provide curators with something to do (ie buy art). The headlines of disarray at the museum and mass firings are hurting the reputation of the museum for some time to come. If people on the board had misgivings, perhaps they shpuld have more forcefully opposed efforts that they have seemingly been unable to fund, like expansion and the costs it has created!

  4. See, I told u Indyman and Dipsicle....this 8 days is overkill. It's barely worth a weekend....great job Tony George! Your dream has been fulfilled....he fans want the I r l back. Thats how good it was.....and that sucked.

  5. I have been in training for a short time now but right off I can see that safety and quality are the number one issues, my experience as of late has been a positive one, the employees along with Jeff the plant manager and the operation supervisor as well as the engineers are a highly motivated group of people, what an asset for the area to have and for company's in need of a quality metal products.

ADVERTISEMENT