IBJNews

CIB to fight council's attempt to take $15 million

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A $15-million payment from the Capital Improvement Board of Marion County to the city of Indianapolis is looking unlikely for 2013.

The board’s directors voted Thursday afternoon on three actions that will circumvent the $15 million payment-in-lieu-of-taxes, or PILOT, which the Indianapolis City-County Council included in the CIB’s budget.

Council Democrats were counting on the PILOT to fund a police and firefighter recruit class and to help close a gap in the city’s roughly $1 billion 2013 budget. The CIB is a municipal corporation that runs downtown properties, including Banker’s Life Fieldhouse and Lucas Oil Stadium, which are exempt from property taxes.

Without the $15 million, the city will have to spend more of its rainy-day fund than Mayor Greg Ballard had anticipated in his version of the city’s budget. Ballard and the council are at odds over imposing the fee on the CIB, but Ballard opted to let the board fight its own legal battles.

The CIB’s directors voted unanimously to appeal the property-tax assessment that resulted in the $15-million PILOT. CIB officials argue that Marion County Assessor Joseph O’Connor should have assessed the properties by March 1 if the city wanted to impose a PILOT for 2013. Further, the CIB’s leadership said they haven’t even received the assessment yet.

The CIB will also ask the State Board of Accounts to determine whether its budget was properly approved by the council, and whether to follow the 2012 or 2013 budget in the meantime.

“We’re kind of walking new ground here,” CIB Chairwoman Ann Lathrop said.

The CIB’s vote was 7-0 with two members absent: City-County Council President Maggie Lewis and Jay Potesta.

If all else fails, the CIB would consider taking legal action, Lathrop said.

“We just don’t believe it’s prudent,” she said of the PILOT. “We’re on our way to solvency and this would derail that.”

The once cash-strapped CIB expects to have a cash balance of about $67 million by year’s end. But Lathrop, insists that much of the reserve—$52 million—is earmarked for improvements to the properties it operates and debt payments.

The council scheduled a special meeting Thursday evening where it will attempt to override Ballard’s line-item budget vetoes. Democrats are the majority with 16 members on the council, but it takes 20 votes to override a veto.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Irresponsible
    I think everyone is happy to see someone standing up to the irresponsible appointees on the Capital Improvement Board who don't care about wasting our public's money. I wish it was our Mayor doing it, but our Mayor has never demanded any accountability from the CIB so I guess we shouldn't be surprised.. The CIB's handling of the Pacer $33.5 million giveaway three years ago was reprehensible, a complete abdication of the public's trust. The Legislature should dissolve the CIB and send Lathrop and her worthless crew packing.
  • CIB?
    it would be a shame for CIB BOD to not have ther 250,000 a year salary with a 500 dollar a month car allowance and there city gas cards. Lets not forget that they all drive hundred thousand dollar cars and get kickback from companys they grant contracts.If you ever met a CIB BOD you would know without knowing by there egotistical statements of ownership of the city as well as the cleshay " Do you know who i am ".
  • CIB $$
    ITS NOT THEIR $$. ITS OURS. This organization is so egotistical and filled with conflict of interest as to be ridiculous. Look at the bios for each of the CIB members and you'll see what I mean. But hey, taxpayers don't seem to care.
    • CIB=MAFIA
      Amazing how Ann and her cronies screw over Joe Citizen. It's not their money and now the taxpayers get to pay BT legal fees. These peeps must be transplanted from East Chicago/Gary. No ethics and certainly no morals. If you live in the suburbs all you are a slave to the power elites that run this banana republic. You get a Mayor and his cronies who fraudulently give taxpayer assets like a fire station and land to developers and call it a sale when there are NO SALE PROCEEDS. The city takes property from the tax rolls and places it in TIFFS (Mayors private slush fund for his crony pay to play buddies) and then coughs and says to Joe Citizen we need to raise your taxes! UNETHICAL!

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I took Bruce's comments to highlight a glaring issue when it comes to a state's image, and therefore its overall branding. An example is Michigan vs. Indiana. Michigan has done an excellent job of following through on its branding strategy around "Pure Michigan", even down to the detail of the rest stops. Since a state's branding is often targeted to visitors, it makes sense that rest stops, being that point of first impression, should be significant. It is clear that Indiana doesn't care as much about the impression it gives visitors even though our branding as the Crossroads of America does place importance on travel. Bruce's point is quite logical and accurate.

    2. I appreciated the article. I guess I have become so accustomed to making my "pit stops" at places where I can ALSO get gasoline and something hot to eat, that I hardly even notice public rest stops anymore. That said, I do concur with the rationale that our rest stops (if we are to have them at all) can and should be both fiscally-responsible AND designed to make a positive impression about our state.

    3. I don't know about the rest of you but I only stop at these places for one reason, and it's not to picnic. I move trucks for dealers and have been to rest areas in most all 48 lower states. Some of ours need upgrading no doubt. Many states rest areas are much worse than ours. In the rest area on I-70 just past Richmond truckers have to hike about a quarter of a mile. When I stop I;m generally in a bit of a hurry. Convenience,not beauty, is a primary concern.

    4. Community Hospital is the only system to not have layoffs? That is not true. Because I was one of the people who was laid off from East. And all of the LPN's have been laid off. Just because their layoffs were not announced or done all together does not mean people did not lose their jobs. They cherry-picked people from departments one by one. But you add them all up and it's several hundred. And East has had a dramatic drop I in patient beds from 800 to around 125. I know because I worked there for 30 years.

    5. I have obtained my 6 gallon badge for my donation of A Positive blood. I'm sorry to hear that my donation was nothing but a profit center for the Indiana Blood Center.

    ADVERTISEMENT