IBJNews

CIB to fight council's attempt to take $15 million

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A $15-million payment from the Capital Improvement Board of Marion County to the city of Indianapolis is looking unlikely for 2013.

The board’s directors voted Thursday afternoon on three actions that will circumvent the $15 million payment-in-lieu-of-taxes, or PILOT, which the Indianapolis City-County Council included in the CIB’s budget.

Council Democrats were counting on the PILOT to fund a police and firefighter recruit class and to help close a gap in the city’s roughly $1 billion 2013 budget. The CIB is a municipal corporation that runs downtown properties, including Banker’s Life Fieldhouse and Lucas Oil Stadium, which are exempt from property taxes.

Without the $15 million, the city will have to spend more of its rainy-day fund than Mayor Greg Ballard had anticipated in his version of the city’s budget. Ballard and the council are at odds over imposing the fee on the CIB, but Ballard opted to let the board fight its own legal battles.

The CIB’s directors voted unanimously to appeal the property-tax assessment that resulted in the $15-million PILOT. CIB officials argue that Marion County Assessor Joseph O’Connor should have assessed the properties by March 1 if the city wanted to impose a PILOT for 2013. Further, the CIB’s leadership said they haven’t even received the assessment yet.

The CIB will also ask the State Board of Accounts to determine whether its budget was properly approved by the council, and whether to follow the 2012 or 2013 budget in the meantime.

“We’re kind of walking new ground here,” CIB Chairwoman Ann Lathrop said.

The CIB’s vote was 7-0 with two members absent: City-County Council President Maggie Lewis and Jay Potesta.

If all else fails, the CIB would consider taking legal action, Lathrop said.

“We just don’t believe it’s prudent,” she said of the PILOT. “We’re on our way to solvency and this would derail that.”

The once cash-strapped CIB expects to have a cash balance of about $67 million by year’s end. But Lathrop, insists that much of the reserve—$52 million—is earmarked for improvements to the properties it operates and debt payments.

The council scheduled a special meeting Thursday evening where it will attempt to override Ballard’s line-item budget vetoes. Democrats are the majority with 16 members on the council, but it takes 20 votes to override a veto.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Irresponsible
    I think everyone is happy to see someone standing up to the irresponsible appointees on the Capital Improvement Board who don't care about wasting our public's money. I wish it was our Mayor doing it, but our Mayor has never demanded any accountability from the CIB so I guess we shouldn't be surprised.. The CIB's handling of the Pacer $33.5 million giveaway three years ago was reprehensible, a complete abdication of the public's trust. The Legislature should dissolve the CIB and send Lathrop and her worthless crew packing.
  • CIB?
    it would be a shame for CIB BOD to not have ther 250,000 a year salary with a 500 dollar a month car allowance and there city gas cards. Lets not forget that they all drive hundred thousand dollar cars and get kickback from companys they grant contracts.If you ever met a CIB BOD you would know without knowing by there egotistical statements of ownership of the city as well as the cleshay " Do you know who i am ".
  • CIB $$
    ITS NOT THEIR $$. ITS OURS. This organization is so egotistical and filled with conflict of interest as to be ridiculous. Look at the bios for each of the CIB members and you'll see what I mean. But hey, taxpayers don't seem to care.
    • CIB=MAFIA
      Amazing how Ann and her cronies screw over Joe Citizen. It's not their money and now the taxpayers get to pay BT legal fees. These peeps must be transplanted from East Chicago/Gary. No ethics and certainly no morals. If you live in the suburbs all you are a slave to the power elites that run this banana republic. You get a Mayor and his cronies who fraudulently give taxpayer assets like a fire station and land to developers and call it a sale when there are NO SALE PROCEEDS. The city takes property from the tax rolls and places it in TIFFS (Mayors private slush fund for his crony pay to play buddies) and then coughs and says to Joe Citizen we need to raise your taxes! UNETHICAL!

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I'm a CPA who works with a wide range of companies (through my firm K.B.Parrish & Co.); however, we work with quite a few car dealerships, so I'm fairly interested in Fatwin (mentioned in the article). Does anyone have much information on that, or a link to such information? Thanks.

    2. Historically high long-term unemployment, unprecedented labor market slack and the loss of human capital should not be accepted as "the economy at work [and] what is supposed to happen" and is certainly not raising wages in Indiana. See Chicago Fed Reserve: goo.gl/IJ4JhQ Also, here's our research on Work Sharing and our support testimony at yesterday's hearing: goo.gl/NhC9W4

    3. I am always curious why teachers don't believe in accountability. It's the only profession in the world that things they are better than everyone else. It's really a shame.

    4. It's not often in Indiana that people from both major political parties and from both labor and business groups come together to endorse a proposal. I really think this is going to help create a more flexible labor force, which is what businesses claim to need, while also reducing outright layoffs, and mitigating the impact of salary/wage reductions, both of which have been highlighted as important issues affecting Hoosier workers. Like many other public policies, I'm sure that this one will, over time, be tweaked and changed as needed to meet Indiana's needs. But when you have such broad agreement, why not give this a try?

    5. I could not agree more with Ben's statement. Every time I look at my unemployment insurance rate, "irritated" hardly describes my sentiment. We are talking about a surplus of funds, and possibly refunding that, why, so we can say we did it and get a notch in our political belt? This is real money, to real companies, large and small. The impact is felt across the board; in the spending of the company, the hiring (or lack thereof due to higher insurance costs), as well as in the personal spending of the owners of a smaller company.

    ADVERTISEMENT