City hosting U.S.-China vehicle summit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The city of Indianapolis this week will host the first U.S.-China Advanced Technology Vehicle Summit, bringing together dozens of government officials and auto executives from the United States and China.

The event is set for Thursday and Friday at the downtown Marriott hotel. A delegation of Chinese automakers and Indiana manufacturers of components for hybrid and electric vehicles will meet to share information and explore potential business relationships.

“Last year, we took Indiana’s story to China for the first time,” Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels said in a prepared statement. “Now, we’ll welcome our colleagues from the Chinese Ministry of Commerce and representatives from some of the country’s major automakers to Indiana for the first time.”

The Chinese delegation will be led by Wang Chao, the country’s assistant minister of commerce. In all, nearly 100 auto executives representing 15 Chinese automobile companies and government officials will attend the summit.

Participating Indiana manufacturers include Indianapolis-based Allison Transmission and EnerDel; Columbus-based Cummins Inc.; Pendleton-based Remy International; and Delphi Automotive Systems of Kokomo. The companies represent a growing cluster of businesses producing advanced batteries, engines, transmissions and electronics for hybrid and electric vehicles.

Daniels will speak at a welcome dinner Thursday evening at the Eiteljorg Museum of American Indians and Western Art.

The event will be hosted by the Energy Systems Network, a not-for-profit that promotes growth and commercialization within the clean technologies and energy sectors. The network is an initiative of the Central Indiana Corporate Partnership.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.